4D Point Cloud Segmentation via Active Test-Time Adaptation
Mingrong Gong, Chaoqi Chen, Luyao Tang, Yuxi Wang, Sergio Escalera
Abstract
4D point cloud segmentation is crucial for autonomous driving with continuous LiDAR streams. While test-time adaptation (TTA) is the standard approach for handling dynamic environments, current methods suffer from catastrophic error accumulation due to over-reliance on pseudo-labels. Active learning could provide reliable annotations for critical samples, but combining it with TTA faces severe challenges: realtime processing requirements and expensive 3D labeling costs. In this paper, we propose ATTA-4DSeg, the first framework to achieve efficient active test-time adaptation for 4D point cloud segmentation under extreme budget constraints. Our key insight is a self-reinforcing loop: oracle annotations refine adaptation prototypes, which then guide the selection of subsequent high-value samples from regions with severe distribution shifts, maximizing each annotation’s impact. Specifically, we propose three key innovations: (1) dual-prototype comparison that precisely localizes distribution shift boundaries to narrow annotation scope, (2) Class-Inverse Budget Allocation (CIBA) ensuring balanced adaptation across all categories, coupled with hybrid uncertainty scoring combining voxel-level geometry and point-wise variance for optimal sample selection, and (3) a refinement strategy leveraging sparse oracle annotations to improve predictions on unlabeled points, maximizing annotation utility. Extensive experiments show ATTA-4DSeg improves mIoU by 18.87%, 19.92%, and 3.6% on three domain adaptation benchmarks using only 1% annotation budget. Our method operates 2.28× faster than state-of-the-art methods. Remarkably, our approach reaches 90% of fully-supervised performance using only 5% annotation budget.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e72b50a-393b-45e9-96e1-30371c5243beBuilds on25
- SemanticKITTI: A Dataset for Semantic Scene Understanding of LiDAR SequencesJens Behley, Martin Garbade, Andres Milioto, Jan Quenzel et al.ICCV 2019 · 2,345 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
- Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution ShiftsYu Sun, Xiaolong Wang, Zhuang Liu, John Miller et al.ICML 2020 · 1,220 citations
- Continual Test-Time Domain AdaptationQin Wang, Olga Fink, Luc Van Gool, Dengxin DaiCVPR 2022 · 383 citations
Related papers
- D^3CTTA: Domain-Dependent Decorrelation for Continual Test-Time Adaption of 3D LiDAR SegmentationJichun Zhao, Haiyong Jiang, Haoxuan Song, Jun Xiao et al.CVPR 2025
- Adaptive Dual Uncertainty Optimization: Boosting Monocular 3D Object Detection under Test-Time ShiftsZixuan Hu, Dongxiao Li, Xinzhu Ma, Shixiang Tang et al.ICCV 2025
- Active Test-Time Adaptation: Theoretical Analyses and An AlgorithmShurui Gui, Xiner Li, Shuiwang JiICLR 2024 · 26 citations
- Exposing Mixture and Annotating Confusion for Active Universal Test-Time AdaptationJiayao Tan, Fan Lyu, Chenggong Ni, Fuyuan Hu et al.ICLR 2026
- Annotator: A Generic Active Learning Baseline for LiDAR Semantic SegmentationBinhui Xie, Shuang Li, Qingju Guo, Chi Harold Liu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
