HelpSteer3: Human-Annotated Feedback and Edit Data to Empower Inference-Time Scaling in Open-Ended General-Domain Tasks
Zhilin Wang, Jiaqi Zeng, Olivier Delalleau, Daniel Egert, Ellie Evans, Hoo-Chang Shin, Felipe Soares, Yi Dong, Oleksii Kuchaiev
Abstract
Inference-Time Scaling has been critical to the success of recent models such as OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1. However, many techniques used to train models for inference-time scaling require tasks to have answers that can be verified, limiting their application to domains such as math, coding and logical reasoning. We take inspiration from how humans make first attempts, ask for detailed feedback from others and make improvements based on such feedback across a wide spectrum of open-ended endeavors. To this end, we collect HelpSteer3 data to train dedicated Feedback and Edit Models that are capable of performing inference-time scaling for open-ended general-domain tasks. In our setup, one model generates an initial response, which are given feedback by a second model, that are then used by a third model to edit the response. We show that performance on Arena Hard, a benchmark strongly predictive of Chatbot Arena Elo can be boosted by scaling the number of initial response drafts, effective feedback and edited responses. When scaled optimally, our setup based on 70B models from the Llama 3 family can reach SoTA performance on Arena Hard at 92.7 as of 5 Mar 2025, surpassing OpenAI o1-preview-2024-09-12 with 90.4 and DeepSeek R1 with 92.3.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Chasing Moving Targets with Online Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Safer Language ModelsMickel Liu, Liwei Jiang, Yancheng Liang, Simon Du et al.ICML 2026 · 34 citations
- Foundational Automatic Evaluators: Scaling Multi-Task Generative Evaluator Training for Reasoning-Centric DomainsAustin Xu, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Yilun Zhou, Chien-Sheng Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- RLBFF: Binary Flexible Feedback to bridge between Human Feedback & Verifiable RewardsZhilin Wang, Jiaqi Zeng, Olivier Delalleau, Ellie Evans et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- DuPO: Enabling Reliable Self-Verification via Dual Preference OptimizationShuaijie She, Yu Bao, Yu Lu, Lu Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- C2: Scalable Rubric-Augmented Reward Modeling from Binary PreferencesAkira Kawabata, Saku SugawaraACL 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on12
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- CodeSteer: Symbolic-Augmented Language Models via Code/Text GuidanceYongchao Chen, Yilun Hao, Yueying Liu, Yang Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with PreferencesZhilin Wang, Alexander Bukharin, Olivier Delalleau, Daniel Egert et al.ICLR 2025
- Understanding the Role of Training Data in Test-Time ScalingAdel Javanmard, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Vahab MirrokniICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Scaling Prompt Synthesis for Large Language Model ReasoningXueliang Zhao, Wei Wu, Jian Guan, Zhuocheng Gong et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
