Decrypting Cryptic Crosswords: Semantically Complex Wordplay Puzzles as a Target for NLP
Josh Rozner, Christopher Potts, Kyle Mahowald
Abstract
Cryptic crosswords, the dominant crossword variety in the UK, are a promising target for advancing NLP systems that seek to process semantically complex, highly compositional language. Cryptic clues read like fluent natural language but are adversarially composed of two parts: a definition and a wordplay cipher requiring character-level manipulations. Expert humans use creative intelligence to solve cryptics, flexibly combining linguistic, world, and domain knowledge. In this paper, we make two main contributions. First, we present a dataset of cryptic clues as a challenging new benchmark for NLP systems that seek to process compositional language in more creative, human-like ways. After showing that three non-neural approaches and T5, a state-of-the-art neural language model, do not achieve good performance, we make our second main contribution: a novel curriculum approach, in which the model is first fine-tuned on related tasks such as unscrambling words. We also introduce a challenging data split, examine the meta-linguistic capabilities of subword-tokenized models, and investigate model systematicity by perturbing the wordplay part of clues, showing that T5 exhibits behavior partially consistent with human solving strategies. Although our curricular approach considerably improves on the T5 baseline, our best-performing model still fails to generalize to the extent that humans can. Thus, cryptic crosswords remain an unsolved challenge for NLP systems and a potential source of future innovation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8d4b5d15-9d25-4832-b142-30a6584efee3Cited by top-tier papers4
- Automated Crossword SolvingEric Wallace, Nicholas Tomlin, Albert Xu, Kevin Yang et al.ACL 2022 · 17 citations
- Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A SurveyPanagiotis Giadikiaroglou, Maria Lymperaiou, Giorgos Filandrianos, Giorgos StamouEMNLP 2024 · 9 citations
- Glider: Global and Local Instruction-Driven Expert RouterPingzhi Li, Prateek Yadav, Jaehong Yoon, Jie Peng et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- A Reasoning-Based Approach to Cryptic Crossword Clue SolvingMartin Andrews, Sam WitteveenICML 2025
Builds on3
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of DataEmily M. Bender, Alexander KollerACL 2020 · 914 citations
- Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language ModelsMor Geva, Ankit Gupta, Jonathan BerantACL 2020 · 12 citations
Related papers
- Down and Across: Introducing Crossword-Solving as a New NLP BenchmarkSaurabh Kulshreshtha, Olga Kovaleva, Namrata Shivagunde, Anna RumshiskyACL 2022 · 5 citations
- Learning from Task DescriptionsOrion Weller, Nicholas Lourie, Matt Gardner, Matthew E. PetersEMNLP 2020 · 4 citations
- Creativity or Brute Force? Using Brainteasers as a Window into the Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsSophia Simeng Han, Howard Dai, Stephen Xia, Grant Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Connecting the Dots: Evaluating Abstract Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs Using the New York Times Connections Word GamePrisha Samadarshi, Mariam Mustafa, Anushka Kulkarni, Raven Rothkopf et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
- PuzzLing Machines: A Challenge on Learning From Small DataGözde Gül Sahin, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Phillip Rust, Iryna GurevychACL 2020
