SCOPE: Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise LLM Judging
Sher Badshah, Ali Emami, Hassan Sajjad
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as scalable judges in pairwise evaluation, but they remain prone to miscalibration and biases. We propose SCOPE (Selective Conformal Optimized Pairwise Evaluation), a framework that calibrates an acceptance threshold so that, under exchangeability, the error rate among non-abstained judgments is at most a user-specified level . To supply SCOPE with a bias-neutral uncertainty signal, we introduce Bidirectional Preference Entropy (BPE), which queries the judge under both response positions and converts the order-averaged preference probability into an entropy-based score. Across various pairwise judging benchmarks, BPE outperforms standard confidence proxies in calibration and discrimination, while SCOPE consistently satisfies the target risk bound (empirical FDR -- at ) and retains substantial coverage. Compared to vanilla baselines, SCOPE accepts up to more judgments under the same risk constraint, demonstrating that BPE enables reliable and high-coverage LLM-based evaluation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate ThemYidong Wang, Yunze Song, Tingyuan Zhu, Xuanwang Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 29 citations
- A Judge-Aware Ranking Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models without Ground TruthMingyuan Xu, Xinzi Tan, Jiawei Wu, Doudou ZhouICML 2026
- How to Correctly Report LLM-as-a-Judge EvaluationsChungpa Lee, Thomas Zeng, Jongwon Jeong, Jy-yong Sohn et al.ICML 2026 · 24 citations
- Bridging Human and LLM Judgments: Understanding and Narrowing the GapFelipe Maia Polo, Xinhe Wang, Mikhail Yurochkin, Gongjun Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Who can we trust? LLM-as-a-jury for Comparative AssessmentMengjie Qian, Guangzhi Sun, Mark Gales, Kate KnillICML 2026 · 5 citations
