EMNLP Findings2025
FG-PRM: Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Language Model Mathematical Reasoning
Ruosen Li, Ziming Luo, Xinya Du
Abstract
Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) pose significant challenges in tasks requiring complex multi-step reasoning, such as mathematical problem-solving.Existing approaches primarily detect the presence of hallucinations but lack a nuanced understanding of their types and manifestations.In this paper, we first introduce a comprehensive taxonomy that categorizes the common hallucinations in mathematical reasoning tasks into six types.We then propose FG-PRM (Fine-Grained Process Reward Model), an augmented model designed to detect and mitigate hallucinations in a finegrained, step-level manner.To address the limitations of manually labeling training data, we propose an automated method for generating fine-grained hallucination data using LLMs.Our FG-PRM demonstrates superior performance across two key tasks: 1) Finegrained hallucination detection: classifying hallucination types for each reasoning step; and 2) Verification: ranking multiple LLMgenerated outputs to select the most accurate solution.Our experiments show that FG-PRM excels in fine-grained hallucination detection and substantially boosts the performance of LLMs on GSM8K and MATH benchmarks.These results highlight the benefits of finegrained supervision in enhancing the reliability and interpretability of LLM reasoning processes.Codes and datasets are available at: https://github.com/du-nlp-lab/FG-PRM.Step1: Subtract 3 from both sides: 2x + 3 -3 = 11 -3 This simplifies to: 2x = 8Step3: So, the solution to the equation is x = 4. Correct Reasoning StepsStep2: Divide both sides by 2: 2x / 2 = 8 / 2 This simplifies to: x = 4Feasibility Verification (e.g.Can Calculation Error be injected?)Hallucination Injection Yes No Question: Solve the equation 2x + 3 = 11 step by step.Correct Answer: x = 4 Yes Subtract 3 from both sides: 2x + 3 -3 = 11 -3 This simplifies to: 2x = 6 Divide both sides by 2: 2x / 2 = 8 This simplifies to: x = 5
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 5 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero DataChengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongming Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 220 citations
- Adversarial Training for Process Reward ModelsGurusha Juneja, Deepak Nathani, William WangICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Grounding LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Embodied ActionsBo Zhang, Jinfeng Zhou, Yuxuan Chen, Jianing Yin et al.ICML 2026
- R-C2: Cycle-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Improves Multimodal ReasoningZirui Zhang, Haoyu Dong, Kexin Pei, Chengzhi MaoCVPR 2026
- Global-Local Confidence Fusion for Hallucination Detection in Mathematical Reasoning TaskBo Zhang, Cong Gao, Linkang Yang, Bingxu Han et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World ModelShibo Hao, Yi Gu, Haodi Ma, Joshua Jiahua Hong et al.EMNLP 2023 · 109 citations
Related papers
- Towards Hierarchical Multi-Step Reward Models for Enhanced Reasoning in Large Language ModelsTeng Wang, Zhangyi Jiang, Zhenqi He, Hailei Gong et al.ACL Findings 2026 · 1 citation
- Error Typing for Smarter Rewards: Improving Process Reward Models with Error-Aware Hierarchical SupervisionPala Tej Deep, Panshul Sharma, Amir Zadeh, Chuan Li et al.EMNLP Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- Debate4MATH: Multi-Agent Debate for Fine-Grained Reasoning in MathShaowei Zhang, Deyi XiongACL Findings 2025 · 5 citations
- Reasoning Models Hallucinate More: Factuality-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning ModelsJunyi Li, Hwee Tou NgNeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Rationales for Answers to Simple Math Word Problems Confuse Large Language ModelsYidan Zhang, Mingfeng Xue, Dayiheng Liu, Zhenan HeACL Findings 2024 · 1 citation
