Adversarially Robust Decision Transformer
Xiaohang Tang, Afonso Marques, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Ilija Bogunovic
Abstract
Decision Transformer (DT), as one of the representative Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning (RvS) methods, has achieved strong performance in offline learning tasks by leveraging the powerful Transformer architecture for sequential decision-making. However, in adversarial environments, these methods can be non-robust, since the return is dependent on the strategies of both the decision-maker and adversary. Training a probabilistic model conditioned on observed return to predict action can fail to generalize, as the trajectories that achieve a return in the dataset might have done so due to a suboptimal behavior adversary. To address this, we propose a worst-case-aware RvS algorithm, the Adversarially Robust Decision Transformer (ARDT), which learns and conditions the policy on in-sample minimax returns-to-go. ARDT aligns the target return with the worst-case return learned through minimax expectile regression, thereby enhancing robustness against powerful test-time adversaries. In experiments conducted on sequential games with full data coverage, ARDT can generate a maximin (Nash Equilibrium) strategy, the solution with the largest adversarial robustness. In large-scale sequential games and continuous adversarial RL environments with partial data coverage, ARDT demonstrates significantly superior robustness to powerful test-time adversaries and attains higher worst-case returns compared to contemporary DT methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on30
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling ProblemMichael Janner, Qiyang Li, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 950 citations
- Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning is a Sequence Modeling ProblemMuning Wen, Jakub Grudzien Kuba, Runji Lin, Weinan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 408 citations
Related papers
- Waypoint Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning with Intermediate TargetsAnirudhan Badrinath, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Allen Nie, Emma BrunskillNeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
- Tackling Data Corruption in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingJiawei Xu, Rui Yang, Shuang Qiu, Feng Luo et al.ICLR 2025
- Supervised Pretraining Can Learn In-Context Reinforcement LearningJonathan Lee, Annie Xie, Aldo Pacchiano, Yash Chandak et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 170 citations
- Reward-Preserving Counterfactual State Editing for Offline Reinforcement LearningSiyu Wang, Xiaocong Chen, Mingming Gong, Yong Li et al.ICML 2026
- Rethinking Decision Transformer via Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Hebin Liang, Chenjun XiaoICML 2024 · 15 citations
