Lune

ACM MM2024Top-tier venue

Mesh-Centric Gaussian Splatting for Human Avatar Modelling with Real-time Dynamic Mesh Reconstruction

Ruiqi Zhang, Jie Chen

2024Year
6Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Real-time mesh reconstruction is highly demanded for integrating human avatar in modern computer graphics applications. Current methods typically use coordinate-based MLP to represent 3D scene as Signed Distance Field (SDF) and optimize it through volumetric rendering, relying on Marching Cubes for mesh extraction. However, volumetric rendering lacks training and rendering efficiency, and the dependence on Marching Cubes significantly impacts mesh extraction efficiency. This study introduces a novel approach, Mesh-Centric Gaussian Splatting (MCGS), which introduces a unique representation Mesh-Centric SDF and optimizes it using high-efficiency Gaussian Splatting. The primary innovation introduces Mesh-Centric SDF, a thin layer of SDF enveloping the underlying mesh, and could be efficiently derived from mesh. This derivation of SDF from mesh allows for mesh optimization through SDF, providing mesh as 0 iso-surface, and eliminating the need for slow Marching Cubes. The secondary innovation focuses on optimizing Mesh-Centric SDF with high-efficiency Gaussian Splatting. By dispersing the underlying mesh of Mesh-Centric SDF into multiple layers and generating Mesh-Constrained Gaussians on them, we create Multi-Layer Gaussians. These Mesh-Constrained Gaussians confine Gaussians within a 2D surface space defined by mesh, ensuring an accurate correspondence between Gaussian rendering and mesh geometry. The Multi-Layer Gaussians serve as sampling layers of Mesh-Centric SDF and can be optimized with Gaussian Splatting, which would further optimize Mesh-Centric SDF and its underlying mesh. As a result, our method can directly optimize the underlying mesh through Gaussian Splatting, providing fast training and rendering speeds derived from Gaussian Splatting, as well as precise surface learning of SDF. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves dynamic mesh reconstruction at over 30 FPS. In contrast, SDF-based methods using Marching Cubes achieve less than 1 FPS, and concurrent 3D Gaussian Splatting-based methods cannot extract reasonable mesh.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get 8cc3858c-683c-43ac-a132-da9f36ffddf8

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines