On Sampling with Approximate Transport Maps
Louis Grenioux, Alain Oliviero Durmus, Eric Moulines, Marylou Gabrié
Abstract
Transport maps can ease the sampling of distributions with non-trivial geometries by transforming them into distributions that are easier to handle. The potential of this approach has risen with the development of Normalizing Flows (NF) which are maps parameterized with deep neural networks trained to push a reference distribution towards a target. NF-enhanced samplers recently proposed blend (Markov chain) Monte Carlo methods with either (i) proposal draws from the flow or (ii) a flow-based reparametrization. In both cases, the quality of the learned transport conditions performance. The present work clarifies for the first time the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches. Our study concludes that multimodal targets can be reliably handled with flow-based proposals up to moderately high dimensions. In contrast, methods relying on reparametrization struggle with multimodality but are more robust otherwise in high-dimensional settings and under poor training. To further illustrate the influence of target-proposal adequacy, we also derive a new quantitative bound for the mixing time of the Independent Metropolis-Hastings sampler.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8caad656-33d3-4af4-a594-240141ad3420Cited by top-tier papers8
- Iterated Denoising Energy Matching for Sampling from Boltzmann DensitiesTara Akhound-Sadegh, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Avishek Joey Bose, Sarthak Mittal et al.ICML 2024 · 109 citations
- Stochastic Localization via Iterative Posterior SamplingLouis Grenioux, Maxence Noble, Marylou Gabrié, Alain Oliviero DurmusICML 2024 · 28 citations
- Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing FlowsAlberto Cabezas, Louis Sharrock, Christopher NemethNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo SamplersLuhuan Wu, Yi Han, Christian Andersson Naesseth, John P. CunninghamNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Parallel Affine Transformation Tuning of Markov Chain Monte CarloPhilip Schär, Michael Habeck, Daniel RudolfICML 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on9
- Relaxing Bijectivity Constraints with Continuously Indexed Normalising FlowsRobert Cornish, Anthony L. Caterini, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud DoucetICML 2020 · 141 citations
- Semi-Supervised Learning with Normalizing FlowsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Marc Finzi, Andrew Gordon WilsonICML 2020 · 134 citations
- Your GAN is Secretly an Energy-based Model and You Should Use Discriminator Driven Latent SamplingTong Che, Ruixiang Zhang, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Hugo Larochelle et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 128 citations
- Annealed Flow Transport Monte CarloMichael Arbel, Alexander G. de G. Matthews, Arnaud DoucetICML 2021 · 99 citations
- Local-Global MCMC kernels: the best of both worldsSergey Samsonov, Evgeny Lagutin, Marylou Gabrié, Alain Durmus et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Annealing Flow Generative Models Towards Sampling High-Dimensional and Multi-Modal DistributionsDongze Wu, Yao XieICML 2025
- Projected Latent Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Conditional Sampling of Normalizing FlowsChris Cannella, Mohammadreza Soltani, Vahid TarokhICLR 2021 · 1 citation
- Learning Optimal Flows for Non-Equilibrium Importance SamplingYu Cao, Eric Vanden-EijndenNeurIPS 2022 · 5 citations
- Amortized Sampling with Transferable Normalizing FlowsCharlie B. Tan, Majdi Hassan, Leon Klein, Saifuddin Syed et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- Stochastic Normalizing FlowsHao Wu, Jonas Köhler, Frank NoéNeurIPS 2020 · 230 citations
