Locally Testable Tree Codes
Tamer Mour, Alon Rosen, Ron Rothblum
Abstract
Tree codes, introduced in the seminal works of Schulman (STOC 93', IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 96') are codes designed for interactive communication. Encoding in a tree code is done in an online manner: the i-th codeword symbol depends only on the first i message symbols. Codewords should have good tree distance meaning that for any two codewords, starting at the first point of divergence, they should have large Hamming distance.
We investigate whether tree codes can be made to be locally testable. That is, can a tester, which is given oracle access to an alleged codeword w of the tree code, decide whether w is indeed a codeword or far from such, while only reading a sub-linear number of symbols from w.
As the main result of this work, we construct, for any r ≥ 3, a probabilistic tree code that is locally testable using Õ(n 2/r ) queries. The tester accepts any codeword with probability 1 and rejects strings that are δ r -far from the code with high probability, where δ r < 1 degrades with r. Our probabilistic notion of a tree code is a relaxation of the standard notion and allows the encoder to toss random coins. We require that encoded messages are far (in tree distance) from any possible encoding of any other message.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on2
Related papers
- On Decoding Cohen-Haeupler-Schulman Tree CodesAnand Kumar Narayanan, Matthew WeidnerSODA 2020 · 2 citations
- Explicit binary tree codes with sub-logarithmic size alphabetInbar Ben Yaacov, Gil Cohen, Tal YankovitzSTOC 2022 · 1 citation
- Deterministic and Efficient Interactive Coding from Hard-to-Decode Tree CodesZvika Brakerski, Yael Tauman Kalai, Raghuvansh R. SaxenaFOCS 2020 · 3 citations
- Relaxed Local Correctability from Local TestingVinayak M. Kumar, Geoffrey MonSTOC 2024 · 1 citation
- Constant-Cost Communication Is Not Reducible to k-Hamming DistanceYuting Fang, Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Pooya HatamiSTOC 2025 · 2 citations
