Complete Knowledge: Preventing Encumbrance of Cryptographic Secrets
Mahimna Kelkar, Kushal Babel, Philip Daian, James Austgen, Vitalik Buterin, Ari Juels
Abstract
Most cryptographic protocols model a player's knowledge of secrets in a simple way. Informally, the player knows a secret in the sense that she can directly furnish it as a (private) input to a protocol, e.g., to digitally sign a message. The growing availability of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and secure multiparty computation, however, undermines this model of knowledge. Such tools can encumber a secret sk and permit a chosen player to access sk conditionally, without actually knowing sk. By permitting selective access to sk by an adversary, encumbrance of secrets can enable vote-selling in cryptographic voting schemes, illegal sale of credentials for online services, and erosion of deniability in anonymous messaging systems. Unfortunately, existing proof-of-knowledge protocols fail to demonstrate that a secret is unencumbered. We therefore introduce and formalize a new notion called complete knowledge (CK). A proof (or argument) of CK shows that a prover does not just know a secret, but also has fully unencumbered knowledge, i.e., unrestricted ability to use the secret. We introduce two practical CK schemes that use specialpurpose hardware, specifically TEEs and off-the-shelf mining ASICs. We prove the security of these schemes and explore their practical deployment with a complete, end-to-end prototype that supports both. We show how CK can address encumbrance attacks identified in previous work. Finally, we introduce two new applications enabled by CK that involve proving ownership of blockchain assets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8c804558-fac8-474f-961e-0385e8b4f0baCited by top-tier papers3
- Breaking Omertà: On Threshold Cryptography, Smart Collusion, and WhistleblowingMahimna Kelkar, Aadityan Ganesh, Aditi Partap, Joseph Bonneau et al.CCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain AssetsJames Austgen, Andrés Fábrega, Mahimna Kelkar, Dani Vilardell et al.S&P 2025
- On the Pitfalls of Modeling Individual KnowledgeWojciech Ciszewski, Stefan Dziembowski, Tomasz Lizurej, Marcin MielniczukCCS 2026
Builds on3
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- VoteAgain: A scalable coercion-resistant voting systemWouter Lueks, Iñigo Querejeta-Azurmendi, Carmela TroncosoUSENIX Security 2020
Related papers
- GZKP: A GPU Accelerated Zero-Knowledge Proof SystemWeiliang Ma, Qian Xiong, Xuanhua Shi, Xiaosong Ma et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 47 citations
- Beholder SignaturesStefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Pawel Kedzior, Marcin Mielniczuk et al.CRYPTO 2026 · 1 citation
- BatchZK: A Fully Pipelined GPU-Accelerated System for Batch Generation of Zero-Knowledge ProofsTao Lu, Yuxun Chen, Zonghui Wang, Xiaohang Wang et al.ASPLOS 2025 · 11 citations
- Toward Practical Lattice-Based Proof of Knowledge from Hint-MLWEDuhyeong Kim, Dongwon Lee, Jinyeong Seo, Yongsoo SongCRYPTO 2023 · 47 citations
- Pipelonk: Accelerating End-to-End Zero-Knowledge Proof Generation on GPUs for PLONK-Based ProtocolsZhiyuan Zhang, Yanxin Cai, Wenhao Yin, Xueyu Wu et al.PPoPP 2026 · 1 citation
