IntelliDroid: A Targeted Input Generator for the Dynamic Analysis of Android Malware
Michelle Y. Wong, David Lie
Abstract
While dynamic malware analysis methods generally provide better precision than purely static methods, they have the key drawback that they can only detect malicious behavior if it is executed during analysis. This requires inputs that trigger the malicious behavior to be applied during execution. All current methods, such as hard-coded tests, random fuzzing and concolic testing, can provide good coverage but are inefficient because they are unaware of the specific capabilities of the dynamic analysis tool. In this work, we introduce IntelliDroid, a generic Android input generator that can be configured to produce inputs specific to a dynamic analysis tool, for the analysis of any Android application. Furthermore, IntelliDroid is capable of determining the precise order that the inputs must be injected, and injects them at what we call the device-framework interface such that system fidelity is preserved. This enables it to be paired with full-system dynamic analysis tools such as TaintDroid. Our experiments demonstrate that IntelliDroid requires an average of 72 inputs and only needs to execute an average of 5% of the application to detect malicious behavior. When evaluated on 75 instances of malicious behavior, IntelliDroid successfully identifies the behavior, extracts path constraints, and executes the malicious code in all but 5 cases. On average, IntelliDroid performs these tasks in 138.4 seconds per application. Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8c7e027b-51d2-4c95-8118-224d917a7eb6Cited by top-tier papers34
- MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral ModelsEnrico Mariconti, Lucky Onwuzurike, Panagiotis Andriotis, Emiliano De Cristofaro et al.NDSS 2017 · 471 citations
- TaintART: A Practical Multi-level Information-Flow Tracking System for Android RunTimeMingshen Sun, Tao Wei, John C. S. LuiCCS 2016 · 188 citations
- TriggerScope: Towards Detecting Logic Bombs in Android ApplicationsYanick Fratantonio, Antonio Bianchi, William K. Robertson, Engin Kirda et al.S&P 2016 · 161 citations
- Time-travel testing of Android appsZhen Dong, Marcel Böhme, Lucia Cojocaru, Abhik RoychoudhuryICSE 2020 · 104 citations
- Automated Generation of Event-Oriented Exploits in Android Hybrid AppsGuangliang Yang, Jeff Huang, Guofei GuNDSS 2018 · 79 citations
Related papers
- Harvesting Runtime Values in Android Applications That Feature Anti-Analysis TechniquesSiegfried Rasthofer, Steven Arzt, Marc Miltenberger, Eric BoddenNDSS 2016 · 157 citations
- Boosting the Performance of Alias-Aware IFDS Analysis with CFL-Based Environment TransformersHaofeng Li, Chenghang Shi, Jie Lu, Lian Li et al.OOPSLA 2024 · 6 citations
- TextExerciser: Feedback-driven Text Input Exercising for Android ApplicationsYuyu He, Lei Zhang, Zhemin Yang, Yinzhi Cao et al.S&P 2020 · 30 citations
- PacDroid: A Pointer-Analysis-Centric Framework for Security Vulnerabilities in Android AppsMenglong Chen, Tian Tan, Minxue Pan, Yue LiICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- The impact of tool configuration spaces on the evaluation of configurable taint analysis for AndroidAustin Mordahl, Shiyi WeiISSTA 2021 · 13 citations
