Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detection
Xinlin Peng, Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun, Yingfei Sun
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in text generation tasks. However, the utilization of these models carries inherent risks, including but not limited to plagiarism, the dissemination of fake news, and issues in educational exercises. Although several detectors have been proposed to address these concerns, their effectiveness against adversarial perturbations, specifically in the context of student essay writing, remains largely unexplored. This paper aims to bridge this gap by constructing AIG-ASAP, an AI-generated student essay dataset, employing a range of text perturbation methods that are expected to generate high-quality essays while evading detection. Through empirical experiments, we assess the performance of current AIGC detectors on the AIG-ASAP dataset. The results reveal that the existing detectors can be easily circumvented using straightforward automatic adversarial attacks. Specifically, we explore word substitution and sentence substitution perturbation methods that effectively evade detection while maintaining the quality of the generated essays. This highlights the urgent need for more accurate and robust methods to detect AI-generated student essays in the education domain. Code and data are released for public use 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8c7a4ce9-0e18-41f6-a209-7b13810ab7cdCited by top-tier papers2
- Are AI-Generated Text Detectors Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?Guanhua Huang, Yuchen Zhang, Zhe Li, Yongjian You et al.ACL 2024 · 7 citations
- DivScore: Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text in Specialized DomainsZhihui Chen, Kai He, Yucheng Huang, Yunxiao Zhu et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on2
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defenseKalpesh Krishna, Yixiao Song, Marzena Karpinska, John Wieting et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 657 citations
Related papers
- AI Wrote My Paper and All I Got was This False Negative:* Measuring the Efficacy of Commercial AI Text DetectorsSeth Layton, Bernardo B. P. Medeiros, Kevin R. B. Butler, Patrick TraynorS&P 2026 · 3 citations
- Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated TextYize Cheng, Vinu Sankar Sadasivan, Mehrdad Saberi, Shoumik Saha et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content DetectorsYing Zhou, Ben He, Le SunACL 2024
- An Empirical Study to Evaluate AIGC Detectors on Code ContentJian Wang, Shangqing Liu, Xiaofei Xie, Yi LiASE 2024 · 4 citations
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
