Formalizing the Binding Problem
Lianghuan Huang, Yihao Li, Saeed Salehi, Yingshan Chang, Ansh Soni, Konrad Kording
Abstract
Representations of the world, arguably, contain information about features (e.g. something is blue, something is a circle) but also information about which features are part of the same object (e.g. the circle is blue), which we call binding information. Any system with the ability to understand scenes with multiple objects must be able to solve the binding problem: it needs to know which features belong together. However, despite work showing that Vision Transformers (ViTs) know which patches belong together, it is not known whether current deep learning models learn to exhibit binding information, i.e., for features. We may believe that there is not much binding information, after all misattributing features to wrong objects is a common failure of ViT-based architectures, especially in scenes with objects sharing features. Here we formalize the binding problem with an information-theoretic approach, and introduce a probing method to measure binding information in model representations. We perform experiments on ViTs, measuring binding from different components of the architecture, such as the image summary token [CLS] or the spatial tokens. We use datasets with different binding challenges, such as feature sharing, occlusion, and natural features, while comparing the performance of several pre-trained ViTs. Overall, our research demonstrates binding as a key ingredient to strong visual recognition and reasoning. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8bcde6c3-859f-40f1-9051-696fe2ef338eBuilds on23
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy ReductionJure Zbontar, Li Jing, Ishan Misra, Yann LeCun et al.ICML 2021 · 2,942 citations
- Object-Centric Learning with Slot AttentionFrancesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,275 citations
Related papers
- Does Object Binding Naturally Emerge in Large Pretrained Vision Transformers?Yihao Li, Saeed Salehi, Lyle H. Ungar, Konrad P. KordingNeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- How can embedding models bind concepts?Arnas Uselis, Darina Koishigarina, Seong Joon OhICML 2026
- Visual symbolic mechanisms: Emergent symbol processing in Vision Language ModelsRim Assouel, Declan Iain Campbell, Yoshua Bengio, Taylor Whittington WebbICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Beyond the Doors of Perception: Vision Transformers Represent Relations Between ObjectsMichael A. Lepori, Alexa R. Tartaglini, Wai Keen Vong, Thomas Serre et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 22 citations
- Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding ProblemDeclan Campbell, Sunayana Rane, Tyler Giallanza, Nicolò De Sabbata et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 101 citations
