Fun-tuning: Characterizing the Vulnerability of Proprietary LLMs to Optimization-Based Prompt Injection Attacks via the Fine-Tuning Interface
Andrey Labunets, Nishit V. Pandya, Ashish Hooda, Xiaohan Fu, Earlence Fernandes
Abstract
We surface a new threat to closed-weight Large Language Models (LLMs) that enables an attacker to compute optimization-based prompt injections. Specifically, we characterize how an attacker can leverage the loss-like information returned from the remote fine-tuning interface to guide the search for adversarial prompts. The fine-tuning interface is hosted by an LLM vendor and allows developers to fine-tune LLMs for their tasks, thus providing utility, but also exposes enough information for an attacker to compute adversarial prompts. Through an experimental analysis, we characterize the loss-like values returned by the Gemini fine-tuning API and demonstrate that they provide a useful signal for discrete optimization of adversarial prompts using a greedy search algorithm. Using the PurpleLlama prompt injection benchmark, we demonstrate attack success rates between 65% and 82% on Google's Gemini family of LLMs. These attacks exploit the classic utility-security tradeoff - the fine-tuning interface provides a useful feature for developers but also exposes the LLMs to powerful attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b5ca4c0-3bd2-4098-bea7-2f89cee91622Cited by top-tier papers5
- PromptLocate: Localizing Prompt Injection AttacksYuqi Jia, Yupei Liu, Zedian Shao, Jinyuan Jia et al.S&P 2026 · 35 citations
- Odysseus: Jailbreaking Commercial Multimodal LLM-integrated Systems via Dual SteganographySongze Li, Jiameng Cheng, Yiming Li, Xiaojun Jia et al.NDSS 2026 · 9 citations
- Measuring Real-World Prompt Injection Attacks in LLM-based Resume ScreeningMohan Zhang, Yuqi Jia, Zhen Tan, Steven Jiang et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 4 citations
- A Large-scale Measurement of In-Page Prompt Injections Against LLM Web AgentsSoheil Khodayari, Xuenan Zhang, Bhupendra Acharya, Giancarlo PellegrinoCCS 2026
- HijackKV: New Threat in Position-Independent KV Cache ReuseYichi Zhang, Zhiqi Wang, Huan Zhang, Yuchen YangUSENIX Security 2026
Builds on18
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
Related papers
- LoopLLM: Transferable Energy-Latency Attacks in LLMs via Repetitive GenerationXingyu Li, Xiaolei Liu, Cheng Liu, Yixiao Xu et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- PLeak: Prompt Leaking Attacks against Large Language Model ApplicationsBo Hui, Haolin Yuan, Neil Gong, Philippe Burlina et al.CCS 2024 · 28 citations
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM FinetuningThibaud Gloaguen, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin VechevICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Bypassing Prompt Guards in Production with Controlled-Release PromptingJaiden Fairoze, Sanjam Garg, Keewoo Lee, Mingyuan WangUSENIX Security 2026 · 8 citations
- ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix EmbeddingsHao Wang, Hao Li, Minlie Huang, Lei ShaEMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
