MalwareTotal: Multi-Faceted and Sequence-Aware Bypass Tactics against Static Malware Detection
Shuai He, Cai Fu, Hong Hu, Jiahe Chen, Jianqiang Lv, Shuai Jiang
Abstract
Recent methods have demonstrated that machine learning (ML) based static malware detection models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. However, the generated malware often fails to generalize to production-level anti-malware software (AMS), as they usually involve multiple detection methods. This calls for universal solutions to the problem of malware variants generation. In this work, we demonstrate how the proposed method, MalwareTotal, has allowed malware variants to continue to abound in ML-based, signaturebased, and hybrid anti-malware software. Given a malicious binary, we develop sequential bypass tactics that enable malicious behavior to be concealed within multi-faceted manipulations. Through 12 experiments on real-world malware, we demonstrate that an attacker can consistently bypass detection (98.67%, and 100% attack success rate against ML-based methods EMBER and MalConv, respectively; 95.33%, 92.63%, and 98.52% attack success rate against production-level anti-malware software ClamAV, AMS A, and AMS B, respectively) without modifying the malware functionality. We further demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art adversarial malware generation techniques both in attack success rate and query consumption (the number of queries to the target model). Moreover, the samples generated by our method have demonstrated transferability in the real-world integrated malware detector, VirusTotal. In addition, we show that common mitigation such as adversarial training on known attacks cannot effectively defend against the proposed attack. Finally, we investigate the value of the generated adversarial examples as a means of hardening victim models through an adversarial training procedure, and demonstrate that the accuracy of the retrained model against generated adversarial examples increases by 88.51 percentage points. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Malware and its mitigation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b53f951-4d8d-4eb6-b629-c350d08e7facBuilds on9
- Why Do Adversarial Attacks Transfer? Explaining Transferability of Evasion and Poisoning AttacksAmbra Demontis, Marco Melis, Maura Pintor, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 466 citations
- Natural Attack for Pre-trained Models of CodeZhou Yang, Jieke Shi, Junda He, David LoICSE 2022 · 150 citations
- Practical Automated Detection of Malicious npm PackagesAdriana Sejfia, Max SchäferICSE 2022 · 65 citations
- API2Vec: Learning Representations of API Sequences for Malware DetectionLei Cui, Jiancong Cui, Yuede Ji, Zhiyu Hao et al.ISSTA 2023 · 37 citations
- Adversarial Policy Training against Deep Reinforcement LearningXian Wu, Wenbo Guo, Hua Wei, Xinyu XingUSENIX Security 2021 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Training for Raw-Binary Malware ClassifiersKeane Lucas, Samruddhi Pai, Weiran Lin, Lujo Bauer et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Training Robust ML-based Raw-Binary Malware Detectors in Hours, not MonthsKeane Lucas, Weiran Lin, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. Reiter et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
- MPass: Bypassing Learning-based Static Malware DetectorsJialai Wang, Wenjie Qu, Yi Rong, Han Qiu et al.DAC 2023 · 4 citations
- Automated Mass Malware Factory: The Convergence of Piggybacking and Adversarial Example in Android Malicious Software GenerationHeng Li, Zhiyuan Yao, Bang Wu, Cuiying Gao et al.NDSS 2025
- Evaluating the Robustness of a Production Malware Detection System to Transferable Adversarial AttacksMilad Nasr, Yanick Fratantonio, Luca Invernizzi, Ange Albertini et al.CCS 2025
