Think in Latent, Explain in Language: Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning
Dayuan Zhao, Shengcao Cao, Yu-Xiong Wang, Liang-Yan Gui
Abstract
Latent reasoning has emerged as a powerful alternative to text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT), offering significant gains in computational efficiency by compressing verbose reasoning into compact embeddings. However, compressing reasoning into the latent space renders the thinking opaque, hindering its interpretability. Current methods present a stark trade-off: they either function as unexplainable "black boxes" (e.g., Coconut), where the latent reasoning is not humanreadable, or rely on separate post-hoc decoders for explainability (e.g., Heima), introducing architectural overhead and decoupling the explanation from the actual reasoning process. In this work, we present a unified framework for Self-Explainable Latent Reasoning (SELR) that trains a single model to perform efficient and inherently explainable latent reasoning. Our core contribution is a novel multi-task training objective that optimizes for two goals simultaneously: (1) an Answer Loss that optimizes the latent reasoning trajectory to produce accurate final answers, and (2) a CoT Loss that explicitly trains the same model to decode its own latent representations back into human-understandable reasoning steps. This design ensures that generated latent representations are both task-effective and semantically interpretable, eliminating the need for external decoders. We validate the effectiveness of SELR on both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), demonstrating that SELR achieves superior token efficiency and accuracy compared to baselines, while uniquely providing self-contained explainability without auxiliary models. Project page is available at https: //jasondayuan.github.io/SELR/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b39a3e5-faca-49f7-b9f9-f2f87ac12aa0Builds on20
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Reasoning with Hidden ThinkingXuan Shen, Yizhou Wang, Yufa Zhou, Xiangxi Shi et al.ICML 2026 · 56 citations
- SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language ModelsRenyu Fu, Guibo LuoACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Learning to Reason over Continuous Tokens with Reinforcement LearningYiran Zhao, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- SemCoT: Accelerating Chain-of-Thought Reasoning through Semantically-Aligned Implicit TokensYinhan He, Wendy Zheng, Yaochen Zhu, Zaiyi Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to InterventionShuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
