ASKD: Reinforcement Learning-Style Knowledge Distillation with Quality-Adaptive Skewness
Mingjie Zhang, Xiaoling Zhou, Yuxiao Luo, Yiyu Liu, Shikun Zhang, Wei Ye
Abstract
Knowledge distillation (KD) is a widely adopted technique for transferring the capabilities of large teacher models to smaller student models, thereby significantly reducing inference costs and memory consumption. However, existing KD methods are all constrained by an inherent greedy optimization objective, rooted in the assumption of teacher superiority: "Trust all teacher-generated outputs (TGOs)" and "Distrust any student-generated outputs (SGOs) unsupported by the teacher". We propose ASKD, a novel KD method with adaptive skewness determined by sample quality, refining this objective to: "Learn TGOs proportionally to their quality, and distrust only low-quality unsupported SGOs". ASKD comprises three key components: (1) A reinforcement learning-style optimization formulation to mitigate the inherent approximation bias in sample-based Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence approximations used by previous KD methods; (2) Well-designed quality supervision signals to map and achieve adaptive skewness in skewed KL loss, pioneering the usage of sample quality to adjust learning magnitudes; (3) A gradient-clip function on high-quality SGOs for findings that high-quality SGOs in KL loss fail to yield positive updates and even cause adverse effects on some samples. Extensive experiments indicate that ASKD builds high-performance student models across various tasks, including instruction following, mathematical reasoning, and code generation, outperforming state-of-the-art methods comprehensively and surpassing GRPO-like approaches that use advantages as multiplicative factors. We also provide detailed mathematical proofs demonstrating properties such as Lipschitz continuity of the update coefficient and uniform convergence of the loss function, ensuring theoretical rigor for key components of ASKD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher AssistantSeyed-Iman Mirzadeh, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Ang Li, Nir Levine et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,361 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
Related papers
- SelecTKD: Selective Token-Weighted Knowledge Distillation for LLMsHaiduo Huang, Jiangcheng Song, Yadong Zhang, Pengju RenCVPR 2026 · 18 citations
- Reinforcement-aware Knowledge Distillation for LLM Reasoningzhaoyang zhang, Shuli Jiang, Yantao Shen, Yuting Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- DistiLLM: Towards Streamlined Distillation for Large Language ModelsJongwoo Ko, Sungnyun Kim, Tianyi Chen, Se-Young YunICML 2024 · 86 citations
- Can Students Beyond the Teacher? Distilling Knowledge from Teacher's BiasJianhua Zhang, Yi Gao, Ruyu Liu, Xu Cheng et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved SamplingWenda Xu, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang, Long T. Le et al.ICLR 2025
