Dynamic Deep Prompt Optimization for Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs
Doniyorkhon Obidov, Honggang Yu, Xiaolong Guo, Kaichen Yang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities across many applications but remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which elicit harmful or unintended content. While model fine-tuning is an option for safety alignment, it is costly and prone to catastrophic forgetting. Prompt optimization has emerged as a promising alternative, yet existing prompt-based defenses typically rely on static modifications (e.g., fixed prefixes or suffixes) that cannot adapt to diverse and evolving attacks.
We propose Dynamic Deep Prompt Optimization (DDPO), the first jailbreak defense based on deep prompt optimization. DDPO uses the target LLM's own intermediate layers as feature extractors to dynamically generate defensive embeddings via a lightweight multilayer perceptron. These tailored embeddings are then injected into a subsequent intermediate layer, enabling an input-dependent defense without modifying the LLM's weights. This design ensures high adaptability with minimal computational overhead.
Experiments on a diverse set of models and attacks demonstrate that DDPO significantly outperforms static prompt optimization methods, particularly on weakly aligned models and when handling semantically ambiguous benign prompts, successfully distinguishing them from genuinely harmful requests.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8ab29f71-edd3-4005-a0b9-bdbaecc5995fBuilds on12
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and DiscoveryYuxin Wen, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer, Micah Goldblum et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 454 citations
- GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via CipherYouliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 441 citations
- Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow InstructionsFederico Bianchi, Mirac Suzgun, Giuseppe Attanasio, Paul Röttger et al.ICLR 2024 · 373 citations
- OpenChat: Advancing Open-source Language Models with Mixed-Quality DataGuan Wang, Sijie Cheng, Xianyuan Zhan, Xiangang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 328 citations
Related papers
- Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking AttacksAndy Zhou, Bo Li, Haohan WangNeurIPS 2024 · 198 citations
- TAO-Attack: Toward Advanced Optimization-Based Jailbreak Attacks for Large Language ModelsZhi Xu, Jiaqi Li, Xiaotong Zhang, Hong Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Fight Back Against Jailbreaking via Prompt Adversarial TuningYichuan Mo, Yuji Wang, Zeming Wei, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2024 · 90 citations
- JPU: Bridging Jailbreak Defense and Unlearning via On-Policy Path RectificationXi Wang, Songlei Jian, Shasha Li, Xiaopeng Li et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical MannerXunguang Wang, Daoyuan Wu, Zhenlan Ji, Zongjie Li et al.USENIX Security 2025
