Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generation
Nayeon Lee, Wei Ping, Peng Xu, Mostofa Patwary, Pascale Fung, Mohammad Shoeybi, Bryan Catanzaro
Abstract
Pretrained language models (LMs) are susceptible to generate text with nonfactual information. In this work, we measure and improve the factual accuracy of large-scale LMs for open-ended text generation. We design the FactualityPrompts test set and metrics to measure the factuality of LM generations. Based on that, we study the factual accuracy of LMs with parameter sizes ranging from 126M to 530B. Interestingly, we find that larger LMs are more factual than smaller ones, although a previous study suggests that larger LMs can be less truthful in terms of misconceptions. In addition, popular sampling algorithms (e.g., top-p) in open-ended text generation can harm the factuality due to the ''uniform randomness'' introduced at every sampling step. We propose the factual-nucleus sampling algorithm that dynamically adapts the randomness to improve the factuality of generation while maintaining quality. Furthermore, we analyze the inefficiencies of the standard training method in learning correct associations between entities from factual text corpus (e.g., Wikipedia). We propose a factuality-enhanced training method that uses TopicPrefix for better awareness of facts and sentence completion as the training objective, which can vastly reduce the factual errors. We release our code and FactualityPrompts benchmark at: https://github.com/nayeon7lee/FactualityPrompt.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers52
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive CritiquingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen et al.ICLR 2024 · 699 citations
- FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text GenerationSewon Min, Kalpesh Krishna, Xinxi Lyu, Mike Lewis et al.EMNLP 2023 · 225 citations
- Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and MitigationNiels Mündler, Jingxuan He, Slobodan Jenko, Martin T. VechevICLR 2024 · 172 citations
- HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination DetectionXuefeng Du, Chaowei Xiao, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
Builds on22
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of TokensSebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai et al.ICML 2022 · 1,629 citations
Related papers
- Fine-Tuning Language Models for FactualityKatherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Huaxiu Yao, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Long-form factuality in large language modelsJerry Wei, Chengrun Yang, Xinying Song, Yifeng Lu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 182 citations
- Factuality of Large Language Models: A SurveyYuxia Wang, Minghan Wang, Muhammad Arslan Manzoor, Fei Liu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 23 citations
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- FactBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for In-the-Wild Language Model Factuality EvaluationFarima Fatahi Bayat, Lechen Zhang, Sheza Munir, Lu WangACL 2025
