Neural Monte Carlo Fluid Simulation
Pranav Jain, Ziyin Qu, Peter Yichen Chen, Oded Stein
Abstract
The idea of using a neural network to represent continuous vector fields (i.e., neural fields) has become popular for solving PDEs arising from physics simulations. Here, the classical spatial discretization (e.g., finite difference) of PDE solvers is replaced with a neural network that models a differentiable function, so the spatial gradients of the PDEs can be readily computed via autodifferentiation. When used in fluid simulation, however, neural fields fail to capture many important phenomena, such as the vortex shedding experienced in the von Kármán vortex street experiment. We present a novel neural network representation for fluid simulation that augments neural fields with explicitly enforced boundary conditions as well as a Monte Carlo pressure solver to get rid of all weakly enforced boundary conditions. Our method, the Neural Monte Carlo method (NMC), is completely mesh-free, i.e., it doesn’t depend on any grid-based discretization. While NMC does not achieve the state-of-the-art accuracy of the well-established grid-based methods, it significantly outperforms previous mesh-free neural fluid methods on fluid flows involving intricate boundaries and turbulence regimes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8a7171bc-429f-4dfc-8d2a-c77b143bf1a5Cited by top-tier papers6
- Guiding-Based Importance Sampling for Walk on StarsTianyu Huang, Jingwang Ling, Shuang Zhao, Feng XuSIGGRAPH 2025 · 6 citations
- Lifting the Winding Number: Precise Discontinuities in Neural Fields for Physics SimulationYue Chang, Mengfei Liu, Zhecheng Wang, Peter Yichen Chen et al.SIGGRAPH 2025 · 4 citations
- Gaussian Fluids: A Grid-Free Fluid Solver based on Gaussian Spatial RepresentationJingrui Xing, Bin Wang, Mengyu Chu, Baoquan ChenSIGGRAPH 2025 · 2 citations
- Curvature-aware Graph Attention for PDEs on ManifoldsYunfeng Liao, Jiawen Guan, Xiucheng LiICML 2025
- Low-Rank Koopman Deformables with Log-Linear Time IntegrationYue Chang, Peter Yichen Chen, Eitan Grinspun, Maurizio M. ChiaramonteSIGGRAPH 2026
Builds on18
- Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation FunctionsVincent Sitzmann, Julien N. P. Martel, Alexander W. Bergman, David B. Lindell et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 4,008 citations
- From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like oneEmilien Dupont, Hyunjik Kim, S. M. Ali Eslami, Danilo Jimenez Rezende et al.ICML 2022 · 209 citations
- Geometry Processing with Neural FieldsGuandao Yang, Serge J. Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, Vladlen KoltunNeurIPS 2021 · 109 citations
- Monte Carlo geometry processing: a grid-free approach to PDE-based methods on volumetric domainsRohan Sawhney, Keenan CraneSIGGRAPH 2020 · 99 citations
- Implicit Neural Spatial Representations for Time-dependent PDEsHonglin Chen, Rundi Wu, Eitan Grinspun, Changxi Zheng et al.ICML 2023 · 54 citations
Related papers
- Learning Incompressible Fluid Dynamics from Scratch - Towards Fast, Differentiable Fluid Models that GeneralizeNils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Reinhard KleinICLR 2021 · 82 citations
- Neural Fluid Simulation on Geometric SurfacesHaoxiang Wang, Tao Yu, Hui Qiao, Qionghai DaiICLR 2025
- Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data Using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNsNils Wandel, Michael Weinmann, Michael Neidlin, Reinhard KleinAAAI 2022 · 82 citations
- A Neural-Preconditioned Poisson Solver for Mixed Dirichlet and Neumann Boundary ConditionsKai Weixian Lan, Elias Gueidon, Ayano Kaneda, Julian Panetta et al.ICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Neural Physical Simulation with Multi-Resolution Hash Grid EncodingHaoxiang Wang, Tao Yu, Tianwei Yang, Hui Qiao et al.AAAI 2024 · 10 citations
