Generating API Parameter Security Rules with LLM for API Misuse Detection
Jinghua Liu, Yi Yang, Kai Chen, Miaoqian Lin
Abstract
In this paper, we present a new framework, named GPTAid, for automatic APSRs generation by analyzing API source code with LLM and detecting API misuse caused by incorrect parameter use. To validate the correctness of the LLM-generated APSRs, we propose an execution feedback-checking approach based on the observation that security-critical API misuse is often caused by APSRs violations, and most of them result in runtime errors. Specifically, GPTAid first uses LLM to generate raw APSRs and the Right calling code, and then generates Violation code for each raw APSR by modifying the Right calling code using LLM. Subsequently, GPTAid performs dynamic execution on each piece of Violation code and further filters out the incorrect APSRs based on runtime errors. To further generate concrete APSRs, GPTAid employs a code differential analysis to refine the filtered ones. Particularly, as the programming language is more precise than natural language, GPTAid identifies the key operations within Violation code by differential analysis, and then generates the corresponding concrete APSR based on the aforementioned operations. These concrete APSRs could be precisely interpreted into applicable detection code, which proven to be effective in API misuse detection. Implementing on the dataset containing 200 randomly selected APIs from eight popular libraries, GPTAid achieves a precision of 92.3%. Moreover, it generates 6 times more APSRs than state-of-the-art detectors on a comparison dataset of previously reported bugs and APSRs. We further evaluated GPTAid on 47 applications, 210 unknown security bugs were found potentially resulting in severe security issues (e.g., system crashes), 150 of which have been confirmed by developers after our reports.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8a2e9f49-2840-4f52-909b-b69357f54ea3Cited by top-tier papers6
- Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced HallucinationKim Hammar, Tansu Alpcan, Emil C. LupuNDSS 2026 · 16 citations
- A Middle Path for On-Premises LLM Deployment: Preserving Privacy Without Sacrificing Model ConfidentialityHanbo Huang, Yihan Li, Bowen Jiang, Bo Jiang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 4 citations
- LineBreaker: Finding Token-Inconsistency Bugs with Large Language ModelsHongbo Chen, Yifan Zhang, Xing Han, Tianhao Mao et al.ASE 2025 · 3 citations
- HarnessLLM: Rust Verification Harness Generation with Large Language ModelsMinghua Wang, Yuwei Liu, Lin HuangICSE 2026
- Uncovering the iceberg from the tip: Generating API Specifications for Bug Detection via Specification Propagation AnalysisMiaoqian Lin, Kai Chen, Yi Yang, Jinghua LiuNDSS 2025
Builds on19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Large Language Models Are Zero-Shot Fuzzers: Fuzzing Deep-Learning Libraries via Large Language ModelsYinlin Deng, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Haoran Peng, Chenyuan Yang et al.ISSTA 2023 · 253 citations
- HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie et al.EMNLP 2023 · 224 citations
Related papers
- The Midas Touch: Triggering the Capability of LLMs for RM-API Misuse DetectionYi Yang, Jinghua Liu, Kai Chen, Miaoqian LinNDSS 2025
- APISan: Sanitizing API Usages through Semantic Cross-CheckingInsu Yun, Changwoo Min, Xujie Si, Yeongjin Jang et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 107 citations
- Beyond Static Pattern Matching? Rethinking Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMsYifan Xia, Zichen Xie, Peiyu Liu, Kangjie Lu et al.ISSTA 2025 · 2 citations
- PropertyGPT: LLM-driven Formal Verification of Smart Contracts through Retrieval-Augmented Property GenerationYe Liu, Yue Xue, Daoyuan Wu, Yuqiang Sun et al.NDSS 2025
- GPTScan: Detecting Logic Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts by Combining GPT with Program AnalysisYuqiang Sun, Daoyuan Wu, Yue Xue, Han Liu et al.ICSE 2024 · 131 citations
