Towards Precise Prediction Uncertainty in GNNs: Refining GNNs with Topology-grouping Strategy
Hyunjin Seo, Kyusung Seo, Joonhyung Park, Eunho Yang
Abstract
Recent advancements in graph neural networks (GNNs) have highlighted the critical need of calibrating model predictions, with neighborhood prediction similarity recognized as a pivotal component. Existing studies suggest that nodes with analogous neighborhood prediction similarity often exhibit similar calibration characteristics. Building on this insight, recent approaches incorporate neighborhood similarity into node-wise temperature scaling techniques. However, our analysis reveals that this assumption does not hold universally. Calibration errors can differ significantly even among nodes with comparable neighborhood similarity, depending on their confidence levels. This necessitates a re-evaluation of existing GNN calibration methods, as a single, unified approach may lead to sub-optimal calibration. In response, we introduce Simi-Mailbox, a novel approach that categorizes nodes by both neighborhood similarity and their own confidence, irrespective of proximity or connectivity. Our method allows fine-grained calibration by employing group-specific temperature scaling, with each temperature tailored to address the specific miscalibration level of affiliated nodes, rather than adhering to a uniform trend based on neighborhood similarity. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our Simi-Mailbox across diverse datasets on different GNN architectures, achieving up to 13.79% error reduction compared to uncalibrated GNN predictions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 89fa44cd-26fc-4429-8b85-023be67af030Builds on38
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node ClassificationYu Rong, Wenbing Huang, Tingyang Xu, Junzhou HuangICLR 2020 · 1,599 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal LossJishnu Mukhoti, Viveka Kulharia, Amartya Sanyal, Stuart Golodetz et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 674 citations
- Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural NetworksMatthias Minderer, Josip Djolonga, Rob Romijnders, Frances Hubis et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 633 citations
Related papers
- What Makes Graph Neural Networks Miscalibrated?Hans Hao-Hsun Hsu, Yuesong Shen, Christian Tomani, Daniel CremersNeurIPS 2022 · 63 citations
- Calibrating Graph Neural Networks from a Data-centric PerspectiveCheng Yang, Chengdong Yang, Chuan Shi, Yawen Li et al.WWW 2024 · 12 citations
- GETS: Ensemble Temperature Scaling for Calibration in Graph Neural NetworksDingyi Zhuang, Chonghe Jiang, Yunhan Zheng, Shenhao Wang et al.ICLR 2025
- SimCalib: Graph Neural Network Calibration Based on Similarity between NodesBoshi Tang, Zhiyong Wu, Xixin Wu, Qiaochu Huang et al.AAAI 2024
- WATS: Wavelet-Aware Temperature Scaling for Reliable Graph Neural NetworksXiaoyang Li, Linwei Tao, Haohui Lu, Minjing Dong et al.ICLR 2026
