Characterization of Priority-Neutral Matching Lattices
Clayton Thomas
Abstract
We study the structure of the set of priority-neutral matchings. These matchings, introduced by [Ren22], generalize stable matchings by allowing for priority violations in a principled way that enables Pareto-improvements to stable matchings. Known results show that the set of priority-neutral matchings is a lattice, suggesting that these matchings may enjoy the same tractable theoretical structure as stable matchings.
In this paper, we characterize priority-neutral matching lattices, and show that their structure is considerably more intricate than that of stable matching lattices. To begin, we show priority-neutral lattices are not distributive, an important property that characterizes stable lattices and is satisfied by many other lattice structures considered in matching theory and algorithm design. Then, in our main result, we show that priority-neutral lattices are in fact characterized by a more-involved property which we term being a "movement lattice," which allows for significant departures from the order theoretic properties of distributive (and hence stable) lattices. While our results show that priority-neutrality is more intricate than stability, they also establish tractable properties. Indeed, as a corollary of our main result, we obtain the first known polynomial-time algorithm for checking whether a given matching is priority-neutral.
- We thank Ata Atay, Nicole Immorlica, Phil Reny, participants at Stony Brook 2024, and various anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and conversations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 89a5d883-9b0d-47b9-9052-36d22ebcbc9eBuilds on3
- In which matching markets does the short side enjoy an advantage?Yash Kanoria, Seungki Min, Pengyu QianSODA 2021 · 6 citations
- Structural Complexities of Matching MechanismsYannai A. Gonczarowski, Clayton ThomasSTOC 2024 · 4 citations
- At most 3.55n stable matchingsCory Palmer, Dömötör PálvölgyiFOCS 2021 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Quasi-popular Matchings, Optimality, and Extended FormulationsYuri Faenza, Telikepalli KavithaSODA 2020 · 4 citations
- Fair Division with Prioritized AgentsXiaolin Bu, Zihao Li, Shengxin Liu, Jiaxin Song et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Reforming an Envy-Free MatchingTakehiro Ito, Yuni Iwamasa, Naonori Kakimura, Naoyuki Kamiyama et al.AAAI 2022 · 5 citations
- Improved Approximation for Ranking on General GraphsMahsa Derakhshan, Mohammad Roghani, Mohammad Saneian, Tao YuSODA 2026
- Responsive Parallelism with Dynamic and First-Class PrioritiesMarelle León, My Dinh, Stefan K. MullerPLDI 2026
