Teaching an Old LLM Secure Coding: Localized Preference Optimization on Distilled Preferences
Mohammad Saqib Hasan, Saikat Chakraborty, Santu Karmaker, Niranjan Balasubramanian
Abstract
LLM generated code often contains security issues. We address two key challenges in improving secure code generation. First, obtaining high quality training data covering a broad set of security issues is critical. To address this, we introduce a method for distilling a preference dataset of insecure and secure code pairs from frontier LLMs, along with a security reasoning that explains the issues and the fix. The key idea here is to make use of security knowledge sources to devise a systematic prompting strategy that ensures broad coverage. Second, aligning models to secure code requires focusing on localized regions of code. Direct preference optimization methods, like SimPO, are not designed to handle these localized differences and turn out to be ineffective. We address this with a new localized preference optimization algorithm that masks the security related tokens in both the winning (secure) and losing (insecure) responses. To prevent loss in code quality, we also add a regularizer. Evaluations show that both training on our dataset, DiSCo, and the new preference optimization algorithm, LPO, yield substantial reductions in code insecurity while also improving overall code quality. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/StonyBrookNLP/discolpo .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Toward Secure Code Generation: Bridging Correctness and Security via Task-Adaptive Vulnerability Modeling and Execution-Based BenchmarkingJiexin Wang, Liuwen Cao, Xitong Luo, Yang Cao et al.ISSTA 2026 · 4 citations
- Autoregressive, Yet Revisable: In Decoding Revision for Secure Code GenerationChengran Yang, zichao wei, Heminghao Deng, Jinfeng Jiang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on20
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
Related papers
- ProSec: Fortifying Code LLMs with Proactive Security AlignmentXiangzhe Xu, Zian Su, Jinyao Guo, Kaiyuan Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- Instruction Tuning for Secure Code GenerationJingxuan He, Mark Vero, Gabriela Krasnopolska, Martin T. VechevICML 2024 · 69 citations
- PromSec: Prompt Optimization for Secure Generation of Functional Source Code with Large Language Models (LLMs)Mahmoud Nazzal, Issa Khalil, Abdallah Khreishah, NhatHai PhanCCS 2024 · 16 citations
- CoSec: On-the-Fly Security Hardening of Code LLMs via Supervised Co-decodingDong Li, Meng Yan, Yaosheng Zhang, Zhongxin Liu et al.ISSTA 2024 · 10 citations
- Towards Learning (Dis)-Similarity of Source Code from Program ContrastsYangruibo Ding, Luca Buratti, Saurabh Pujar, Alessandro Morari et al.ACL 2022
