Multidimensional Uncertainty-Aware Evidential Neural Networks
Yibo Hu, Yuzhe Ou, Xujiang Zhao, Jin-Hee Cho, Feng Chen
Abstract
Traditional deep neural networks (NNs) have significantly contributed to the state-of-the-art performance in the task of classification under various application domains. However, NNs have not considered inherent uncertainty in data associated with the class probabilities where misclassification under uncertainty may easily introduce high risk in decision making in real-world contexts (e.g., misclassification of objects in roads leads to serious accidents). Unlike Bayesian NN that indirectly infer uncertainty through weight uncertainties, evidential NNs (ENNs) have been recently proposed to explicitly model the uncertainty of class probabilities and use them for classification tasks. An ENN offers the formulation of the predictions of NNs as subjective opinions and learns the function by collecting an amount of evidence that can form the subjective opinions by a deterministic NN from data. However, the ENN is trained as a black box without explicitly considering inherent uncertainty in data with their different root causes, such as vacuity (i.e., uncertainty due to a lack of evidence) or dissonance (i.e., uncertainty due to conflicting evidence). By considering the multidimensional uncertainty, we proposed a novel uncertainty-aware evidential NN called WGAN-ENN (WENN) for solving an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem. We took a hybrid approach that combines Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network (WGAN) with ENNs to jointly train a model with prior knowledge of a certain class, which has high vacuity for OOD samples. Via extensive empirical experiments based on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we demonstrated that the estimation of uncertainty by WENN can significantly help distinguish OOD samples from boundary samples. WENN outperformed in OOD detection when compared with other competitive counterparts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 88c6a685-da7b-43e1-8a05-81f5e8e347a8Cited by top-tier papers9
- Uncertainty-Aware Reliable Text ClassificationYibo Hu, Latifur KhanKDD 2021 · 25 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation by Density Aware Evidential Deep LearningTaeseong Yoon, Heeyoung KimICML 2024 · 16 citations
- CLUR: Uncertainty Estimation for Few-Shot Text Classification with Contrastive LearningJianfeng He, Xuchao Zhang, Shuo Lei, Abdulaziz Alhamadani et al.KDD 2023 · 4 citations
- Evidential Mixture Machines: Deciphering Multi-Label Correlations for Active Learning SensitivityDayou Yu, Minghao Li, Weishi Shi, Qi YuNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Similarity-as-Evidence: Calibrating Overconfident VLMs for Interpretable and Label-Efficient Medical Active LearningZhuofan Xie, Zishan Lin, Jinliang Lin, Jie Qi et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on2
Related papers
- Uncertainty Aware Semi-Supervised Learning on Graph DataXujiang Zhao, Feng Chen, Shu Hu, Jin-Hee ChoNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Hyper Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Composite Classification UncertaintyChangbin Li, Kangshuo Li, Yuzhe Ou, Lance M. Kaplan et al.ICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- Hyper-opinion Evidential Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution DetectionJingen Qu, Yufei Chen, Xiaodong Yue, Wei Fu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Adaptive Uncertainty Estimation via High-Dimensional Testing on Latent RepresentationsTsai Hor Chan, Kin Wai Lau, Jiajun Shen, Guosheng Yin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential RegressionNis Meinert, Jakob Gawlikowski, Alexander LavinAAAI 2023 · 58 citations
