Trustworthy Federated Label Distribution Learning under Annotation Quality Disparity

Label Distribution Learning (LDL) models supervision as an instance-wise probability distribution, enabling fine-grained learning under inherent ambiguity, but its success relies on highfidelity label distributions that are costly to obtain and thus often noisy. Motivated by privacysensitive applications, we study Federated Label Distribution Learning (Fed-LDL), where data isolation further induces heterogeneous annotation quality across clients, making local updates unevenly reliable and breaking sample-size-based aggregation (e.g., FedAvg). To address this trust dilemma, we propose FedQual, a quality-aware Fed-LDL framework with two coupled mechanisms: (i) quality-adaptive client training guided by a global semantic anchor that calibrates lowquality clients while preserving high-quality autonomy, and (ii) reliability-aware server aggregation that reweights client contributions by effective reliable information rather than raw sample size. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct four new Fed-LDL benchmarks (FER-LDL, FI-LDL, PIPAL-LDL, and KADID-LDL) with controlled annotation quality disparity. We further provide a theoretical guarantee showing that under heterogeneous supervision quality, clientspecific calibration is strictly better than any uniform calibration. Extensive experiments on the proposed benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of FedQual.