Procedural Noise Adversarial Examples for Black-Box Attacks on Deep Convolutional Networks
Kenneth T. Co, Luis Muñoz-González, Sixte de Maupeou, Emil C. Lupu
Abstract
Deep Convolutional Networks (DCNs) have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial examples---perturbed inputs specifically designed to produce intentional errors in the learning algorithms at test time. Existing input-agnostic adversarial perturbations exhibit interesting visual patterns that are currently unexplained. In this paper, we introduce a structured approach for generating Universal Adversarial Perturbations (UAPs) with procedural noise functions. Our approach unveils the systemic vulnerability of popular DCN models like Inception v3 and YOLO v3, with single noise patterns able to fool a model on up to 90% of the dataset. Procedural noise allows us to generate a distribution of UAPs with high universal evasion rates using only a few parameters. Additionally, we propose Bayesian optimization to efficiently learn procedural noise parameters to construct inexpensive untargeted black-box attacks. We demonstrate that it can achieve an average of less than 10 queries per successful attack, a 100-fold improvement on existing methods. We further motivate the use of input-agnostic defences to increase the stability of models to adversarial perturbations. The universality of our attacks suggests that DCN models may be sensitive to aggregations of low-level class-agnostic features. These findings give insight on the nature of some universal adversarial perturbations and how they could be generated in other applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 88279ff1-b4a3-452a-89e2-d89c752f9623Cited by top-tier papers12
- Blind Backdoors in Deep Learning ModelsEugene Bagdasaryan, Vitaly ShmatikovUSENIX Security 2021 · 372 citations
- Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial PerturbationsFlorian Tramèr, Jens Behrmann, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2020 · 103 citations
- Universal 3-Dimensional Perturbations for Black-Box Attacks on Video Recognition SystemsShangyu Xie, Han Wang, Yu Kong, Yuan HongS&P 2022 · 32 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Camera AdversariaKieran Browne, Ben Swift, Terhi Nurmikko-FullerCHI 2020 · 9 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Data-Free Universal Attack by Exploiting the Intrinsic Vulnerability of Deep ModelsYangTian Yan, Jinyu TianAAAI 2025
- Robust Universal Adversarial PerturbationsChangming Xu, Gagandeep SinghICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Democratic Training Against Universal Adversarial PerturbationsBing Sun, Jun Sun, Wei ZhaoICLR 2025
- Data-free Universal Adversarial Perturbation with Pseudo-semantic PriorChanhui Lee, Yeonghwan Song, Jeany SonCVPR 2025
- Simple and Efficient Hard Label Black-box Adversarial Attacks in Low Query Budget RegimesSatya Narayan Shukla, Anit Kumar Sahu, Devin Willmott, J. Zico KolterKDD 2021 · 24 citations
