CoTune: Co-evolutionary Configuration Tuning
Gangda Xiong, Tao Chen
Abstract
To automatically tune configurations for the best possible system performance (e.g., runtime or throughput), much work has been focused on designing intelligent heuristics in a tuner. However, existing tuner designs have mostly ignored the presence of complex performance requirements (e.g., "the latency shall ideally be 2 seconds"), but simply assume that better performance is always more preferred. This would not only waste valuable information in a requirement but might also consume extensive resources to tune for a goal with little gain. Yet, prior studies have shown that simply incorporating the requirement as a tuning objective is problematic since the requirement might be too strict, harming convergence; or its highly diverse satisfactions might lead to premature convergence. In this paper, we propose CoTune, a tool that takes the information of a given target performance requirement into account through co-evolution. CoTune is unique in the sense that it creates an auxiliary performance requirement to be co-evolved with the configurations, which assists the target performance requirement when it becomes ineffective or even misleading, hence allowing the tuning to be guided by the requirement while being robust to its harm. Experiment results on 162 cases (nine systems and 18 requirements) reveal that CoTune considerably outperforms existing tuners, ranking as the best for ≈ 90% cases (against the 0%-35% for other tuners) with up to 2.9× overall improvements, while doing so under a much better efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8814dbba-fa91-4d1e-ab4e-704976c801ebCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Increasing the Scope as You Learn: Adaptive Bayesian Optimization in Nested SubspacesLeonard Papenmeier, Luigi Nardi, Matthias PoloczekNeurIPS 2022 · 76 citations
- PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep LearningNeeratyoy Mallik, Edward Bergman, Carl Hvarfner, Danny Stoll et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 50 citations
- GPTune: multitask learning for autotuning exascale applicationsYang Liu, Wissam M. Sid-Lakhdar, Osni Marques, Xinran Zhu et al.PPoPP 2021 · 45 citations
- Multi-objectivizing software configuration tuningTao Chen, Miqing LiFSE 2021 · 40 citations
- Bounce: Reliable High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization for Combinatorial and Mixed SpacesLeonard Papenmeier, Luigi Nardi, Matthias PoloczekNeurIPS 2023 · 40 citations
Related papers
- PromiseTune: Unveiling Causally Promising and Explainable Configuration TuningPengzhou Chen, Tao ChenICSE 2026
- SATune: A Study-Driven Auto-Tuning Approach for Configurable Software Verification ToolsUgur Koc, Austin Mordahl, Shiyi Wei, Jeffrey S. Foster et al.ASE 2021 · 6 citations
- Adapting Multi-objectivized Software Configuration TuningTao Chen, Miqing LiFSE 2024 · 14 citations
- Multi-Intention-Aware Configuration Selection for Performance TuningHaochen He, Zhouyang Jia, Shanshan Li, Yue Yu et al.ICSE 2022 · 11 citations
- DarwinGame: Playing Tournaments for Tuning Applications in Noisy Cloud EnvironmentsRohan Basu Roy, Vijay Gadepally, Devesh TiwariASPLOS 2025 · 1 citation
