Better Feedback from Nicer People: Narrative Empathy and Ingroup Framing Improve Feedback Exchange
Y. Wayne Wu, Brian P. Bailey
Abstract
Online feedback exchange platforms enable content creators to collect a diverse set of design feedback quickly. However, creators can experience low quality and harsh feedback when using such platforms. In this paper, we leverage the empathy of the feedback provider to address both these issues. Specifically, we tested two narrative-based empathy arousal interventions: a negative experience and a design process narrative. We also examined whether ingroup framing further enhances the effects of empathy arousal. In a 3x2 online experiment, participants (n=205) wrote feedback on a poster design after experiencing one of the intervention conditions or a control condition. Our results show both the design process narrative and ingroup framing conditions significantly increased the feedback quality and effort invested in the task. The negative experience narrative condition had similar effects and participants reported significantly increased disapproval towards harsh feedback. We discuss the implications of our results for the design of feedback exchange platforms.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 87e23dda-6306-4ad5-9777-be58ca850564Cited by top-tier papers5
- StoryChat: Designing a Narrative-Based Viewer Participation Tool for Live Streaming ChatroomsRyan Yen, Li Feng, Brinda Mehra, Ching Christie Pang et al.CHI 2023 · 26 citations
- Situating Empathy in HCI/CSCW: A Scoping ReviewUgur Genç, Himanshu VermaCSCW 2024 · 25 citations
- Aligning Crowdworker Perspectives and Feedback Outcomes in Crowd-Feedback System DesignSaskia Haug, Ivo Benke, Alexander MaedcheCSCW 2023 · 9 citations
- Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive SummaryChi-Lan Yang, Alarith Uhde, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki KuzuokaCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Expecting Too Much, Getting Too Little: Exploring the Challenges and Design Opportunities of Asynchronous AI InterviewersMd Nazmus Sakib, Naga Manogna Rayasam, Sanorita DeyCSCW 2026
Related papers
- Plan Early, Revise More: Effects of Goal Setting and Perceived Role of the Feedback Provider on Feedback Seeking BehaviorSneha R. Krishna Kumaran, Yue Yin, Brian P. BaileyCSCW 2021 · 14 citations
- Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Having Hard Conversations in Online SpacesAmanda Baughan, Justin Petelka, Catherine Jaekyung Yoo, Jack Lo et al.CSCW 2021 · 29 citations
- Ask Me or Tell Me? Enhancing the Effectiveness of Crowdsourced Design FeedbackFritz Lekschas, Spyridon Ampanavos, Pao Siangliulue, Hanspeter Pfister et al.CHI 2021 · 13 citations
- Critique Me: Exploring How Creators Publicly Request Feedback in an Online Critique CommunityRuijia Cheng, Ziwen Zeng, Maysnow Liu, Steven DowCSCW 2020 · 34 citations
- What Makes Creators Engage with Online Critiques? Understanding the Role of Artifacts' Creation Stage, Characteristics of Community Comments, and their InteractionsQingyu Guo, Chao Zhang, Hanfang Lyu, Zhenhui Peng et al.CHI 2023 · 10 citations
