Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News
Reuben Tan, Bryan A. Plummer, Kate Saenko
Abstract
Large-scale dissemination of disinformation online intended to mislead or deceive the general population is a major societal problem. Rapid progression in image, video, and natural language generative models has only exacerbated this situation and intensified our need for an effective defense mechanism. While existing approaches have been proposed to defend against neural fake news, they are generally constrained to the very limited setting where articles only have text and metadata such as the title and authors. In this paper, we introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles as well as conduct a series of human user study experiments based on this dataset. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visualsemantic inconsistencies, which will serve as an effective first line of defense and a useful reference for future work in defending against machine-generated disinformation. Our code and dataset can be downloaded from here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87bf7afe-4216-4ca5-93bf-dde2d4b286c1Cited by top-tier papers13
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data HidingSahar Abdelnabi, Mario FritzS&P 2021 · 210 citations
- Unbiased Watermark for Large Language ModelsZhengmian Hu, Lichang Chen, Xidong Wu, Yihan Wu et al.ICLR 2024 · 103 citations
- Open-Domain, Content-based, Multi-modal Fact-checking of Out-of-Context Images via Online ResourcesSahar Abdelnabi, Rakibul Hasan, Mario FritzCVPR 2022 · 79 citations
Builds on4
- A Fast and Accurate One-Stage Approach to Visual GroundingZhengyuan Yang, Boqing Gong, Liwei Wang, Wenbing Huang et al.ICCV 2019 · 441 citations
- Detecting Photoshopped Faces by Scripting PhotoshopSheng-Yu Wang, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Andrew Owens et al.ICCV 2019 · 147 citations
- Saliency-Guided Attention Network for Image-Sentence MatchingZhong Ji, Haoran Wang, Jungong Han, Yanwei PangICCV 2019 · 96 citations
- CNN-Generated Images Are Surprisingly Easy to Spot... for NowSheng-Yu Wang, Oliver Wang, Richard Zhang, Andrew Owens et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- NewsCLIPpings: Automatic Generation of Out-of-Context Multimodal MediaGrace Luo, Trevor Darrell, Anna RohrbachEMNLP 2021 · 58 citations
- Deepfake Text Detection: Limitations and OpportunitiesJiameng Pu, Zain Sarwar, Sifat Muhammad Abdullah, Abdullah Rehman et al.S&P 2023
- InfoSurgeon: Cross-Media Fine-grained Information Consistency Checking for Fake News DetectionYi R. Fung, Christopher Thomas, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Sandeep Polisetty et al.ACL 2021
- Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-Loaded Training Data GenerationKung-Hsiang Huang, Kathleen R. McKeown, Preslav Nakov, Yejin Choi et al.ACL 2023 · 35 citations
- Fact-Enhanced Synthetic News GenerationKai Shu, Yichuan Li, Kaize Ding, Huan LiuAAAI 2021 · 39 citations
