Interpretive Cultures: Resonance, randomness, and negotiated meaning for AI-assisted tarot divination
Matthew Kieran Prock, Ziv Epstein, Hope Schroeder, Amy Smith, Cassandra Lee, Vana Goblot, Farnaz Jahanbakhsh
Abstract
While generative AI tools are increasingly adopted for creative and analytical tasks, their role in interpretive practices, where meaning is subjective, plural, and non-causal, remains poorly understood. This paper examines AI-assisted tarot reading, a divinatory practice in which users pose a query, draw cards through a randomized process, and ask AI systems to interpret the resulting symbols. Drawing on interviews with tarot practitioners and Hartmut Rosa’s Theory of Resonance, we investigate how users seek, negotiate, and evaluate resonant interpretations in a context where no causal relationship exists between the query and the data being interpreted. We identify distinct ways practitioners incorporate AI into their interpretive workflows, including using AI to navigate uncertainty and self-doubt, explore alternative perspectives, and streamline or extend existing divinatory practices. Based on these findings, we offer design recommendations for AI systems that support interpretive meaning-making without collapsing ambiguity or foreclosing user agency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87a21634-b2a2-42d2-a792-0a87f0be59a5Builds on5
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2024 · 762 citations
- Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive ComputingFederico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Valerio BasileAAAI 2023 · 236 citations
- Large Language Models in Qualitative Research: Uses, Tensions, and IntentionsHope Schroeder, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Casey Randazzo, David Mimno et al.CHI 2025 · 40 citations
- Creative Writers' Attitudes on Writing as Training Data for Large Language ModelsKaty Ilonka Gero, Meera A. Desai, Carly Schnitzler, Nayun Eom et al.CHI 2025 · 15 citations
- Ontologies in Design: How Imagining a Tree Reveals Possibilities and Assumptions in Large Language ModelsNava Haghighi, Sunny Yu, James A. Landay, Daniela K. RosnerCHI 2025 · 10 citations
Related papers
- WorkAI: A Toolkit for the Design of AI-driven Future of WorkShadan Sadeghian, Migle Bareikyte, Marcus Burkhardt, Marc HassenzahlCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Human or AI Fortune-Telling: Exploring Users’ Expectations and Trust Formation in Relationship Advice-Seeking with Human vs. AI I-Ching DivinationYuhan Hou, Jialuo Yang, Richmond Y. Wong, Noura HowellCSCW 2026
- Who did it? How User Agency is influenced by Visual Properties of Generated ImagesJohanna K. Didion, Krzysztof Wolski, Dennis Wittchen, David Coyle et al.UIST 2024 · 6 citations
- "Re-Tell the Fortune so I Can Believe It": How Chinese User Communities Engage with and Interpret GenAI-based Fortune-TellingLong Ling, Xiyu Zheng, Gengchen Cao, RAY LCCSCW 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Collaboration between Professional Designers and Decision-making AI: A Case Study in the WorkplaceNami Ogawa, Yuki Okafuji, Yuji Hatada, Jun BabaCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
