Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuning
Hao Li, Pratik Chaudhari, Hao Yang, Michael Lam, Avinash Ravichandran, Rahul Bhotika, Stefano Soatto
Abstract
Fine-tuning from pre-trained ImageNet models has become the de-facto standard for various computer vision tasks. Current practices for fine-tuning typically involve selecting an ad-hoc choice of hyper-parameters and keeping them fixed to values normally used for training from scratch. This paper re-examines several common practices of setting hyper-parameters for fine-tuning. Our findings are based on extensive empirical evaluation for fine-tuning on various transfer learning benchmarks. (1) While prior works have thoroughly investigated learning rate and batch size, momentum for fine-tuning is a relatively unexplored parameter. We find that picking the right value for momentum is critical for fine-tuning performance and connect it with previous theoretical findings. (2) Optimal hyper-parameters for fine-tuning in particular the effective learning rate are not only dataset dependent but also sensitive to the similarity between the source domain and target domain. This is in contrast to hyper-parameters for training from scratch. (3) Reference-based regularization that keeps models close to the initial model does not necessarily apply for "dissimilar" datasets. Our findings challenge common practices of fine- tuning and encourages deep learning practitioners to rethink the hyper-parameters for fine-tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 87346662-00aa-47e4-b640-eacb39dfb3a5Cited by top-tier papers36
- Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelsMitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Jong Wook Kim, Mike Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 364 citations
- LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer LearningKaichao You, Yong Liu, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng LongICML 2021 · 253 citations
- FREE: Feature Refinement for Generalized Zero-Shot LearningShiming Chen, Wenjie Wang, Beihao Xia, Qinmu Peng et al.ICCV 2021 · 171 citations
- Pretraining Representations for Data-Efficient Reinforcement LearningMax Schwarzer, Nitarshan Rajkumar, Michael Noukhovitch, Ankesh Anand et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 151 citations
- Flora: Low-Rank Adapters Are Secretly Gradient CompressorsYongchang Hao, Yanshuai Cao, Lili MouICML 2024 · 113 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Demystify Hyperparameters for Stochastic Optimization with Transferable RepresentationsJianhui Sun, Mengdi Huai, Kishlay Jha, Aidong ZhangKDD 2022 · 5 citations
- Improved Fine-Tuning by Better Leveraging Pre-Training DataZiquan Liu, Yi Xu, Yuanhong Xu, Qi Qian et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 69 citations
- Co-Tuning for Transfer LearningKaichao You, Zhi Kou, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin WangNeurIPS 2020 · 105 citations
- When, Why, and Which Pretrained GANs Are Useful?Timofey Grigoryev, Andrey Voynov, Artem BabenkoICLR 2022 · 25 citations
- What Makes Transfer Learning Work for Medical Images: Feature Reuse & Other FactorsChristos Matsoukas, Johan Fredin Haslum, Moein Sorkhei, Magnus Söderberg et al.CVPR 2022 · 93 citations
