Improving the Variance of Differentially Private Randomized Experiments through Clustering
Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie
Abstract
Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only possible if participants are willing to disclose their potentially sensitive responses. Differential privacy, a widely used framework for ensuring an algorithm's privacy guarantees, can encourage participants to share their responses without the risk of de-anonymization. However, many mechanisms achieve differential privacy by adding noise to the original dataset, which reduces the precision of causal effect estimation. This introduces a fundamental trade-off between privacy and variance when performing causal analyses on differentially private data. In this work, we propose a new differentially private mechanism, CLUSTER-DP, which leverages a given cluster structure in the data to improve the privacyvariance trade-off. While our results apply to any clustering, we demonstrate that selecting higherquality clusters-according to a quality metric we introduce-can decrease the variance penalty without compromising privacy guarantees. Finally, we evaluate the theoretical and empirical performance of our CLUSTER-DP algorithm on both real and simulated data, comparing it to common baselines, including two special cases of our algorithm: its unclustered version and a uniformprior version.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86e73667-82bb-4cb3-b193-ce4b839f3c3cBuilds on1
Related papers
- Differentially Private Explanations for ClustersAmir Gilad, Tova Milo, Kathy Razmadze, Ron ZadicarioSIGMOD 2026 · 3 citations
- Differentially Private Clustering: Tight Approximation RatiosBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin ManurangsiNeurIPS 2020 · 68 citations
- The Adverse Effects of Omitting Records in Differential Privacy: How Sampling and Suppression Degrade the Privacy–Utility TradeoffÀlex Miranda-Pascual, Javier Parra-Arnau, Thorsten StrufeUSENIX Security 2026
- Meeting Utility Constraints in Differential Privacy: A Privacy-Boosting ApproachBo Jiang, Wanrong Zhang, Donghang Lu, Jian Du et al.S&P 2025
- Dependence Makes You Vulnberable: Differential Privacy Under Dependent TuplesChangchang Liu, Supriyo Chakraborty, Prateek MittalNDSS 2016 · 210 citations
