Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations
Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Rupak Sarkar, Pranav Goel, Philip Resnik
Abstract
When people interpret text, they rely on inferences that go beyond the observed language itself. Inspired by this observation, we introduce a method for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly into account. We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed, then validate the plausibility of the generated content via human judgments. Incorporating these explicit representations of implicit content proves useful in multiple problem settings that involve the human interpretation of utterances: assessing the similarity of arguments, making sense of a body of opinion data, and modeling legislative behavior. Our results suggest that modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text alone, is a valuable direction for NLP and particularly its applications to social science. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 86855a95-acd0-4db9-8912-ad1e431331deCited by top-tier papers9
- AutoSchemaKG: Autonomous Knowledge Graph Construction through Dynamic Schema Induction from Web-Scale CorporaJiaxin Bai, Wei Fan, Qi Hu, Qing Zong et al.ACL 2026 · 27 citations
- Artifacts or Abduction: How Do LLMs Answer Multiple-Choice Questions Without the Question?Nishant Balepur, Abhilasha Ravichander, Rachel RudingerACL 2024 · 5 citations
- Interpretable Text Embeddings and Text Similarity Explanation: A SurveyJuri Opitz, Lucas Möller, Andrianos Michail, Sebastian Padó et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Understanding Common Ground Misalignment in Goal-Oriented Dialog: A Case-Study with Ubuntu Chat LogsRupak Sarkar, Neha Srikanth, Taylor Pellegrin, Rachel Rudinger et al.ACL 2025 · 3 citations
- Language is Scary when Over-Analyzed: Unpacking Implied Misogynistic Reasoning with Argumentation Theory-Driven PromptsArianna Muti, Federico Ruggeri, Khalid Al-Khatib, Alberto Barrón-Cedeño et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of DataEmily M. Bender, Alexander KollerACL 2020 · 914 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
Related papers
- Harnessing Toulmin's theory for zero-shot argument explicationAnkita Gupta, Ethan Zuckerman, Brendan T. O'ConnorACL 2024 · 4 citations
- Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLIShreya Havaldar, Hamidreza Alvari, John Palowitch, Mohammad Javad Hosseini et al.ACL 2025
- Leveraging Machine-Generated Rationales to Facilitate Social Meaning Detection in ConversationsRitam Dutt, Zhen Wu, Jiaxin Shi, Divyanshu Sheth et al.ACL 2024 · 2 citations
- Hidden Schema NetworksRamsés J. Sánchez, Lukas Conrads, Pascal Welke, Kostadin Cvejoski et al.ACL 2023 · 1 citation
- ImpScore: A Learnable Metric For Quantifying The Implicitness Level of SentencesYuxin Wang, Xiaomeng Zhu, Weimin Lyu, Saeed Hassanpour et al.ICLR 2025
