PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation?
Jingzhe Xu, Rui Wang, Jiannan Wang, Guoliang Li
Abstract
Data preparation is a central and time-consuming stage in data analysis workflows. Traditionally, commercial tools have relied on graphical user interfaces (GUIs) to simplify data preparation, allowing users to define transformations through visual operators and workflows. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) raise the possibility of a paradigm shift toward natural language (NL)-driven data preparation, in which users can specify preparation intents in NL directly. However, it remains unclear how far current LLM-based agents are from this paradigm shift in practice. Existing code generation benchmarks do not capture key characteristics of data preparation, including ambiguous user intents, imperfect real-world data, and the need to translate code into interpretable workflows for validation. To bridge this gap, we present PrepBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate NL-driven data preparation along three core capabilities: interactive disambiguation, prep-code generation, and code-to-workflow translation. We crawl data from the Preppin' Data Challenges, and then extend it into a systematically designed benchmark. The benchmark covers diverse domains, and each task involves 3 to 18 data preparation steps. Nearly half of the tasks require over 100 lines of Python code, and the longest solutions approach 300 lines. Our evaluation shows that, despite recent progress, realizing this paradigm shift remains challenging for state-of-the-art LLMs. PrepBench provides a principled benchmark for measuring this gap and helps identify key challenges toward realizing NL-driven data preparation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8673fb8b-25f2-4aa4-85d5-e7947ba5649bBuilds on23
- TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact VerificationWenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 674 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
- MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language FeedbackXingyao Wang, Zihan Wang, Jiateng Liu, Yangyi Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 308 citations
- InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis TasksXueyu Hu, Ziyu Zhao, Shuang Wei, Ziwei Chai et al.ICML 2024 · 110 citations
Related papers
- WebCoderBench: Benchmarking Web Application Generation with Comprehensive and Interpretable Evaluation MetricsChenxu Liu, Yingjie Fu, Wei Yang, Ying Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 10 citations
- DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language ModelsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Harshit Surana, Dhruv Agarwal, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra et al.ICLR 2025
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
- BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex InstructionsTerry Yue Zhuo, Minh Chien Vu, Jenny Chim, Han Hu et al.ICLR 2025
- OrchestrationBench: LLM-Driven Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Multi-Domain ScenariosAelim Ahn, Sooyeon Lee, Hyosun Wang, Chiwan Park et al.ICLR 2026
