Prompt-Induced Linguistic Fingerprints for LLM-Generated Fake News Detection
Chi Wang, Min Gao, Zongwei Wang, Junwei Yin, Kai Shu, Chenghua Lin
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), producing realistic fake news has become increasingly effortless, challenging existing detection methods that rely on lexical and syntactic patterns. To address this, we shift our focus to the generation process and analyze how malicious prompts manipulate model outputs. We construct pairs of LLM-generated real and fake news and apply malicious prompts to reconstruct them as fake. By comparing the original-token generation probabilities recorded during reconstruction, we observe a consistent statistical divergence: tokens from real news tend to have lower reconstruction likelihoods than those from fake news. We define this distributional divergence as linguistic fingerprint. Building on this insight, we propose LIFE (Linguistic Fingerprints Extraction), a novel detection framework that reconstructs token-level probability distributions guided by malicious prompts to capture these discriminative linguistic patterns. To fully exploit the extracted fingerprints, LIFE further introduces a key-fragment amplification module that adaptively identifies and accentuates the most distinctive linguistic fragments, thereby enhancing detection reliability across diverse prompting scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LIFE achieves state-ofthe-art performance in detecting LLM-generated fake news while maintaining strong generalization to human-LLM mixed cases. The code is available 1 . CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies → Natural language processing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on17
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human SolutionsJiawei Zhou, Yixuan Zhang, Qianni Luo, Andrea G. Parker et al.CHI 2023 · 283 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Explainable Fake News Detection with Large Language Model via Defense Among Competing WisdomBo Wang, Jing Ma, Hongzhan Lin, Zhiwei Yang et al.WWW 2024 · 104 citations
- Zoom Out and Observe: News Environment Perception for Fake News DetectionQiang Sheng, Juan Cao, Xueyao Zhang, Rundong Li et al.ACL 2022 · 103 citations
Related papers
- PHPFND: Detecting Fake News via Post-Hoc Processing of LLMs HallucinationJinke Ma, Jiachen Ma, Wei Zhang, Yong LiuAAAI 2026
- Adversarial Style Augmentation via Large Language Model for Robust Fake News DetectionSungwon Park, Sungwon Han, Xing Xie, Jae-Gil Lee et al.WWW 2025 · 9 citations
- PROMPRINT: Prompt Fingerprinting via First-Token Response for LLM App Cloning DetectionJungmin Lee, Peizhuo Lv, Yeonjoon LeeACL 2026
- IPAD: Inverse Prompt for AI Detection - A Robust and Interpretable LLM-Generated Text DetectorZheng Chen, Yushi Feng, Jisheng Dang, Changyang He et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Unlocking the Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models for Generalizable and Explainable Deepfake DetectionPeipeng Yu, Jianwei Fei, Hui Gao, Xuan Feng et al.ICML 2025
