Demystifying Spectral Feature Learning for Instrumental Variable Regression
Dimitri Meunier, Antoine Moulin, Jakub Wornbard, Vladimir Kostic, Arthur Gretton
Abstract
We address the problem of causal effect estimation in the presence of hidden confounders, using nonparametric instrumental variable (IV) regression. A leading strategy employs spectral features -that is, learned features spanning the top eigensubspaces of the operator linking treatments to instruments. We derive a generalization error bound for a two-stage least squares estimator based on spectral features, and gain insights into the method's performance and failure modes. We show that performance depends on two key factors, leading to a clear taxonomy of outcomes. In a good scenario, the approach is optimal. This occurs with strong spectral alignment, meaning the structural function is well-represented by the top eigenfunctions of the conditional operator, coupled with this operator's slow eigenvalue decay, indicating a strong instrument. Performance degrades in a bad scenario: spectral alignment remains strong, but rapid eigenvalue decay (indicating a weaker instrument) demands significantly more samples for effective feature learning. Finally, in the ugly scenario, weak spectral alignment causes the method to fail, regardless of the eigenvalues' characteristics. Our synthetic experiments empirically validate this taxonomy. We further introduce a practical procedure to estimate these spectral properties from data, allowing practitioners to diagnose which regime a given problem falls into. We apply this method to the dSprites dataset, demonstrating its utility.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 864910ed-d368-4b60-bbeb-551211cabaafCited by top-tier papers2
- Outcome-Aware Spectral Feature Learning for Instrumental Variable RegressionDimitri Meunier, Jakub Wornbard, Vladimir Kostic, Antoine Moulin et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Toward Scalable and Valid Conditional Independence Testing with Spectral RepresentationsAlek Fröhlich, Vladimir Kostic, Karim Lounici, Daniel Rodrigues Perazzo et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive LossJeff Z. HaoChen, Colin Wei, Adrien Gaidon, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- Neural Networks Fail to Learn Periodic Functions and How to Fix ItLiu Ziyin, Tilman Hartwig, Masahito UedaNeurIPS 2020 · 249 citations
- Minimax Estimation of Conditional Moment ModelsNishanth Dikkala, Greg Lewis, Lester Mackey, Vasilis SyrgkanisNeurIPS 2020 · 125 citations
- Learning Deep Features in Instrumental Variable RegressionLiyuan Xu, Yutian Chen, Siddarth Srinivasan, Nando de Freitas et al.ICLR 2021 · 85 citations
- Sharp Spectral Rates for Koopman Operator LearningVladimir Kostic, Karim Lounici, Pietro Novelli, Massimiliano PontilNeurIPS 2023 · 57 citations
Related papers
- Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression through Stochastic Approximate GradientsYuri R. Fonseca, Caio Peixoto, Yuri F. SaporitoNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Exploiting Independent Instruments: Identification and Distribution GeneralizationSorawit Saengkyongam, Leonard Henckel, Niklas Pfister, Jonas PetersICML 2022 · 19 citations
- Learning Decision Policies with Instrumental Variables through Double Machine LearningDaqian Shao, Ashkan Soleymani, Francesco Quinzan, Marta KwiatkowskaICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Optimality and Adaptivity of Deep Neural Features for Instrumental Variable RegressionJuno Kim, Dimitri Meunier, Arthur Gretton, Taiji Suzuki et al.ICLR 2025
- Causal Inference with Conditional Instruments Using Deep Generative ModelsDebo Cheng, Ziqi Xu, Jiuyong Li, Lin Liu et al.AAAI 2023 · 24 citations
