KScope: A Framework for Characterizing the Knowledge Status of Language Models
Yuxin Xiao, Shan Chen, Jack Gallifant, Danielle S. Bitterman, Tom Hartvigsen, Marzyeh Ghassemi
Abstract
Characterizing a large language model's (LLM's) knowledge of a given question is challenging. As a result, prior work has primarily examined LLM behavior under knowledge conflicts, where the model's internal parametric memory contradicts information in the external context. However, this does not fully reflect how well the model knows the answer to the question. In this paper, we first introduce a taxonomy of five knowledge statuses based on the consistency and correctness of LLM knowledge modes. We then propose KScope, a hierarchical framework of statistical tests that progressively refines hypotheses about knowledge modes and characterizes LLM knowledge into one of these five statuses. We apply KScope to nine LLMs across four datasets and systematically establish: (1) Supporting context narrows knowledge gaps across models. (2) Context features related to difficulty, relevance, and familiarity drive successful knowledge updates. (3) LLMs exhibit similar feature preferences when partially correct or conflicted, but diverge sharply when consistently wrong. (4) Context summarization constrained by our feature analysis, together with enhanced credibility, further improves update effectiveness and generalizes across LLMs.
We summarize our contributions 1 in this paper as follows:
• We define a taxonomy of five knowledge statuses based on consistency and correctness, and propose KScope, a hierarchical testing framework to characterize LLM knowledge status.
• We apply KScope to nine LLMs across four datasets, and establish that supporting context substantially narrows knowledge gaps across model sizes and families.
• We identify key context features related to difficulty, relevance, and familiarity that drive successful knowledge updates.
• We reveal how LLM feature importance differs based on parametric knowledge status, showing similarity under conflict but divergence when consistently wrong.
• We validate that constrained context summarization, combined with improved credibility, significantly boosts successful knowledge updates across all statuses and generalizes well.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 85ee6ab7-4406-4ba6-8ea0-61aed7672a19Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on31
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
Related papers
- Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A SurveyMoxin Li, Yong Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Shuaiyi Li et al.ACL 2025 · 33 citations
- Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A SurveyRongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Zhijiang Guo, Cunxiang Wang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 38 citations
- KGQuiz: Evaluating the Generalization of Encoded Knowledge in Large Language ModelsYuyang Bai, Shangbin Feng, Vidhisha Balachandran, Zhaoxuan Tan et al.WWW 2024 · 6 citations
- Probing the Knowledge Boundary: An Interactive Agentic Framework for Deep Knowledge ExtractionYuheng Yang, Siqi Zhu, Tao Feng, Ge Liu et al.ICML 2026
- Are LLMs Really Not Knowledgeable? Mining the Submerged Knowledge in LLMs' MemoryXingjian Tao, Yiwei Wang, Yujun Cai, Zhicheng Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
