Composable Coresets for Determinant Maximization: Greedy is Almost Optimal
Siddharth Gollapudi, Sepideh Mahabadi, Varun Sivashankar
Abstract
Given a set of vectors in , the goal of the determinant maximization problem is to pick vectors with the maximum volume. Determinant maximization is the MAP-inference task for determinantal point processes (DPP) and has recently received considerable attention for modeling diversity. As most applications for the problem use large amounts of data, this problem has been studied in the relevant composable coreset setting. In particular, [Indyk-Mahabadi-OveisGharan-Rezaei--SODA'20, ICML'19] showed that one can get composable coresets with optimal approximation factor of for the problem, and that a local search algorithm achieves an almost optimal approximation guarantee of . In this work, we show that the widely-used Greedy algorithm also provides composable coresets with an almost optimal approximation factor of , which improves over the previously known guarantee of , and supports the prior experimental results showing the practicality of the greedy algorithm as a coreset. Our main result follows by showing a local optimality property for Greedy: swapping a single point from the greedy solution with a vector that was not picked by the greedy algorithm can increase the volume by a factor of at most . This is tight up to the additive constant . Finally, our experiments show that the local optimality of the greedy algorithm is even lower than the theoretical bound on real data sets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 85d61840-8bb9-4689-85d8-6fd877cdf97bCited by top-tier papers3
- Core-sets for Fair and Diverse Data SummarizationSepideh Mahabadi, Stojan TrajanovskiNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Perfect Lp Sampling with Polylogarithmic Update TimeWilliam Swartworth, David P. Woodruff, Samson ZhouFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Randomized Dimensionality Reduction for Euclidean Maximization and Diversity MeasuresJie Gao, Rajesh Jayaram, Benedikt Kolbe, Shay Sapir et al.ICML 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Lazy and Fast Greedy MAP Inference for Determinantal Point ProcessShinichi Hemmi, Taihei Oki, Shinsaku Sakaue, Kaito Fujii et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Diversity on the Go! Streaming Determinantal Point Processes under a Maximum Induced Cardinality ObjectivePaul Liu, Akshay Soni, Eun Yong Kang, Yajun Wang et al.WWW 2021 · 8 citations
- Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection AlgorithmsAdam Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Pittu, Mohit Singh et al.FOCS 2022 · 2 citations
- Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentrationRémi Bardenet, Subhroshekhar Ghosh, Hugo Simon-Onfroy, Hoang Son TranNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Online MAP Inference of Determinantal Point ProcessesAditya Bhaskara, Amin Karbasi, Silvio Lattanzi, Morteza ZadimoghaddamNeurIPS 2020 · 6 citations
