USENIX Security2018Top-tier venue
Plug and Prey? Measuring the Commoditization of Cybercrime via Online Anonymous Markets
Rolf van Wegberg, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Kyle Soska, Ugur Akyazi, Carlos Hernandez Gañán, Bram Klievink, Nicolas Christin, Michel van Eeten
Abstract
Researchers have observed the increasing commoditization of cybercrime, that is, the offering of capabilities, services, and resources as commodities by specialized suppliers in the underground economy. Commoditization enables outsourcing, thus lowering entry barriers for aspiring criminals, and potentially driving further growth in cybercrime. While there is evidence in the literature of specific examples of cybercrime commoditization, the overall phenomenon is much less understood. Which parts of cybercrime value chains are successfully commoditized, and which are not? What kind of revenue do criminal business-to-business (B2B) services generate and how fast are they growing? We use longitudinal data from eight online anonymous marketplaces over six years, from the original Silk Road to AlphaBay, and track the evolution of commoditization on these markets. We develop a conceptual model of the value chain components for dominant criminal business models. We then identify the market supply for these components over time. We find evidence of commoditization in most components, but the outsourcing options are highly restricted and transaction volume is often modest. Cash-out services feature the most listings and generate the largest revenue. Consistent with behavior observed in the context of narcotic sales, we also find a significant amount of revenue in retail cybercrime, i.e., business-to-consumer (B2C) rather than businessto-business. We conservatively estimate the overall revenue for cybercrime commodities on online anonymous markets to be at least US $15M between 2011-2017. While there is growth, commoditization is a spottier phenomenon than previously assumed.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 85b3484a-ed9d-473f-bee5-acfa4eae99c4Cited by top-tier papers17
- Catching Phishers By Their Bait: Investigating the Dutch Phishing Landscape through Phishing Kit DetectionHugo L. J. Bijmans, Tim M. Booij, Anneke Schwedersky, Aria Nedgabat et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 61 citations
- Platforms in Everything: Analyzing Ground-Truth Data on the Anatomy and Economics of Bullet-Proof HostingArman Noroozian, Jan Koenders, Eelco van Veldhuizen, Carlos Hernandez Gañán et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 40 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Risky Business? Investigating the Security Practices of Vendors on an Online Anonymous Market using Ground-Truth DataJochem van de Laarschot, Rolf van WegbergUSENIX Security 2021 · 15 citations
- Go See a Specialist? Predicting Cybercrime Sales on Online Anonymous Markets from Vendor and Product CharacteristicsRolf van Wegberg, Fieke Miedema, Ugur Akyazi, Arman Noroozian et al.WWW 2020 · 14 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- Economic Factors of Vulnerability Trade and ExploitationLuca AllodiCCS 2017 · 82 citations
- SoK: Digging into the Digital Underworld of Stolen Data MarketsTina Marjanov, Alice HutchingsS&P 2025
- Know Your Cybercriminal: Evaluating Attacker Preferences by Measuring Profile Sales on an Active, Leading Criminal Market for User Impersonation at ScaleMichele Campobasso, Luca AllodiUSENIX Security 2023
- Cybercrime Bitcoin Revenue Estimations: Quantifying the Impact of Methodology and CoverageGibran Gómez, Kevin van Liebergen, Juan CaballeroCCS 2023 · 10 citations
- Resident Evil: Understanding Residential IP Proxy as a Dark ServiceXianghang Mi, Xuan Feng, Xiaojing Liao, Baojun Liu et al.S&P 2019 · 80 citations
