Not Just Skipping: Understanding the Effect of Sponsored Content on Users' Decision-Making in Online Health Search
Anat Hashavit, Hongning Wang, Tamar Stern, Sarit Kraus
Abstract
Advertisements (ads) are an innate part of search engine business models. Marketing research shows sponsored search advertisement is an effective tool to promote sales: advertisers are willing to pay search engines to promote their content to a prominent position in the search result page (SERP). This raises concerns about the search engine manipulation effect (SEME): the opinions of users can be influenced by the way search results are presented.
In this work, we investigate the connection between SEME and sponsored content in the health domain. We conduct a series of user studies in which participants need to evaluate the effectiveness of different non-prescription natural remedies for various medical conditions. We present participants SERPs with different intentionally created biases towards certain viewpoints, with or without sponsored content, and ask them to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment only based on the information presented to them. We investigate two types of sponsored content: 1). Direct marketing ads that directly market the product without expressing an opinion about its effectiveness; and 2). Indirect marketing ads that explicitly advocate the product's effectiveness on the condition in the query. Our results reveal a significant difference between the influence on users from these two types of ads. Though direct marketing ads are mostly skipped by users, they do sometimes tilt users decision making towards more positive viewpoints. Indirect marketing ads affect both the users' examination behaviour and their perception of the treatment's effectiveness. We further discover that the contrast between the indirect marketing ads and the viewpoint presented in the organic search results plays an important role in users' decision-making. When the contrast is high, users exhibit a strong preference towards a negative viewpoint, and when the contrast is low or none, users exhibit preference towards a more positive viewpoint.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8589ec3c-8c90-4ee9-aa3e-6817e1c817daBuilds on2
- This Is Not What We Ordered: Exploring Why Biased Search Result Rankings Affect User Attitudes on Debated TopicsTim Draws, Nava Tintarev, Ujwal Gadiraju, Alessandro Bozzon et al.SIGIR 2021 · 36 citations
- Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Online Health SearchAnat Hashavit, Hongning Wang, Raz Lin, Tamar Stern et al.SIGIR 2021 · 12 citations
Related papers
- How Misinformation Density Affects Health Information SearchQiurong Song, Jiepu JiangWWW 2022 · 9 citations
- Measuring Risks to Users' Health Privacy Posed by Third-Party Web Tracking and Targeted AdvertisingEric Zeng, Xiaoyuan Wu, Emily N. Ertmann, Lily Huang et al.CHI 2025 · 2 citations
- What Makes a "Bad" Ad? User Perceptions of Problematic Online AdvertisingEric Zeng, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska RoesnerCHI 2021 · 55 citations
- The Automated Copywriter: Algorithmic Rephrasing of Health-Related Advertisements to Improve their PerformanceBrit Youngmann, Elad Yom-Tov, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Danny KarmonWWW 2020 · 9 citations
- Dissecting users' needs for search result explanationsPrerna Juneja, Wenjuan Zhang, Alison Marie Smith-Renner, Hemank Lamba et al.CHI 2024 · 4 citations
