Fractal Patterns May Illuminate the Success of Next-Token Prediction
Ibrahim M. Alabdulmohsin, Vinh Q. Tran, Mostafa Dehghani
Abstract
We study the fractal structure of language, aiming to provide a precise formalism for quantifying properties that may have been previously suspected but not formally shown. We establish that language is: (1) self-similar, exhibiting complexities at all levels of granularity, with no particular characteristic context length, and (2) long-range dependent (LRD), with a Hurst parameter of approximately H=0.7. Based on these findings, we argue that short-term patterns/dependencies in language, such as in paragraphs, mirror the patterns/dependencies over larger scopes, like entire documents. This may shed some light on how next-token prediction can capture the structure of text across multiple levels of granularity, from words and clauses to broader contexts and intents. In addition, we carry out an extensive analysis across different domains and architectures, showing that fractal parameters are robust. Finally, we demonstrate that the tiny variations in fractal parameters seen across LLMs improve upon perplexity-based bits-per-byte (BPB) in predicting their downstream performance. We hope these findings offer a fresh perspective on language and the mechanisms underlying the success of LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 854f4c4b-9ed5-4eb6-8a0e-118c43a44745Cited by top-tier papers7
- Recursive Inference Scaling: A Winning Path to Scalable Inference in Language and Multimodal SystemsIbrahim Alabdulmohsin, Xiaohua ZhaiNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Correlation Dimension of Autoregressive Large Language ModelsXin Du, Kumiko Tanaka-IshiiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Looking Beyond Text: Reducing Language Bias in Large Vision-Language Models via Multimodal Dual-Attention and Soft-Image GuidanceHaozhe Zhao, Shuzheng Si, Liang Chen, Yichi Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Next-ToBE: Probabilistic Next Token-Bag Exploitation for Activating Anticipatory Capacity in LLMsYihe Liu, Huibin Wang, Xianming Hu, Pinyi Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric RegulationXin Du, Kumiko Tanaka-IshiiICML 2026
Builds on3
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction TuningShayne Longpre, Le Hou, Tu Vu, Albert Webson et al.ICML 2023 · 908 citations
Related papers
- A Tale of Two Structures: Do LLMs Capture the Fractal Complexity of Language?Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Andreas Peter SteinerICML 2025
- Provable Long-Range Benefits of Next-Token PredictionXinyuan Cao, Santosh S. VempalaSTOC 2026
- Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the Statistics of Natural LanguageFrancesco Cagnetta, Allan Raventos, Surya Ganguli, Matthieu WyartICML 2026
- Auto-Regressive Next-Token Predictors are Universal LearnersEran MalachICML 2024 · 65 citations
- Arrows of Time for Large Language ModelsVassilis Papadopoulos, Jérémie Wenger, Clément HonglerICML 2024 · 16 citations
