A Theoretically Grounded Approach to Summarizing Conversation Dynamics for Forecasting the Derailment of Online Conversations
Yingxue Fu, Anaïs Ollagnier
Abstract
Conversation derailment prediction represents a new paradigm of toxicity detection, where a system predicts from the start of a conversation whether it will derail into toxic exchanges, allowing moderators and users to act preemptively before harm is done. This approach requires a deep understanding of conversation dynamics. Previous work relies on linguistic features rooted in linguistic and social theories. While these features provide signals of conversation dynamics, they are exploratory in nature and potentially reflect a fraction of the overall pragmatic devices shaping the conversation trajectory. To capture the pragmatic dimension of conversations systematically, we start with a framework for annotating pragmatic information of conversations systematically and design summary generation methods to capture conversation trajectory dynamically. We achieve about 10% performance increase over a simple baseline, and 6.47% increase over a strong baseline on a dataset, and a slight performance increase on a benchmark dataset for the task of summarizing conversation dynamics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 854ea794-9ffd-4ca2-abb8-f1dae89caf5eBuilds on6
- Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechMai ElSherief, Caleb Ziems, David Muchlinski, Vaishnavi Anupindi et al.EMNLP 2021 · 159 citations
- COLD: A Benchmark for Chinese Offensive Language DetectionJiawen Deng, Jingyan Zhou, Hao Sun, Chujie Zheng et al.EMNLP 2022 · 82 citations
- Thread With Caution: Proactively Helping Users Assess and Deescalate Tension in Their Online DiscussionsJonathan P. Chang, Charlotte Schluger, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilCSCW 2022 · 27 citations
- Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of LanguageMaarten Sap, Saadia Gabriel, Lianhui Qin, Dan Jurafsky et al.ACL 2020 · 16 citations
- Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?John Pavlopoulos, Jeffrey Sorensen, Lucas Dixon, Nithum Thain et al.ACL 2020 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Toxicity Ahead: Forecasting Conversational Derailment on GitHubMia Mohammad Imran, Robert Zita, Rahat Rizvi Rahman, Preetha Chatterjee et al.ICSE 2026
- Wait! There's a Way Out: A Decision Mechanism for Forecasting Conversational DerailmentLaerdon Kim, Vivian Nguyen, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-MizilACL 2026
- The Structure of Toxic Conversations on TwitterMartin Saveski, Brandon Roy, Deb RoyWWW 2021 · 111 citations
- Conversations Gone Alright: Quantifying and Predicting Prosocial Outcomes in Online ConversationsJiajun Bao, Junjie Wu, Yiming Zhang, Eshwar Chandrasekharan et al.WWW 2021 · 63 citations
- SafeConv: Explaining and Correcting Conversational Unsafe BehaviorMian Zhang, Lifeng Jin, Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi et al.ACL 2023 · 5 citations
