Tamper-Resistant Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMs
Rishub Tamirisa, Bhrugu Bharathi, Long Phan, Andy Zhou, Alice Gatti, Tarun Suresh, Maxwell Lin, Justin Wang, Rowan Wang, Ron Arel, Andy Zou, Dawn Song
Abstract
Rapid advances in the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have raised widespread concerns regarding their potential for malicious use. Open-weight LLMs present unique challenges, as existing safeguards lack robustness to tampering attacks that modify model weights. For example, recent works have demonstrated that refusal and unlearning safeguards can be trivially removed with a few steps of fine-tuning. These vulnerabilities necessitate new approaches for enabling the safe release of open-weight LLMs. We develop a method, called TAR, for building tamper-resistant safeguards into open-weight LLMs such that adversaries cannot remove the safeguards even after hundreds of steps of fine-tuning. In extensive evaluations and red teaming analyses, we find that our method greatly improves tamper-resistance while preserving benign capabilities. Our results demonstrate that progress on tamper-resistance is possible, opening up a promising new avenue to improve the safety and security of open-weight LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 84db7a5f-ecf3-44c6-a151-e11ec6380e71Cited by top-tier papers39
- Lisa: Lazy Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning AttackTiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim F. Tekin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 113 citations
- Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMsKyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony, Tomek Korbak et al.ICLR 2026 · 59 citations
- Erasing Conceptual Knowledge from Language ModelsRohit Gandikota, Sheridan Feucht, Samuel Marks, David BauNeurIPS 2025 · 35 citations
- AsFT: Anchoring Safety During LLM Fine-Tuning Within Narrow Safety BasinShuo Yang, Qihui Zhang, Yuyang Liu, Yue Huang et al.AAAI 2026 · 19 citations
- Shape it Up! Restoring LLM Safety during FinetuningShengyun Peng, Pin-Yu Chen, Jianfeng Chi, Seongmin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
Builds on25
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
Related papers
- AntiDote: Bi-level Adversarial Training for Tamper-Resistant LLMsDebdeep Sanyal, Manodeep Ray, Murari MandalAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMsXiangyu Qi, Boyi Wei, Nicholas Carlini, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2025
- SGT: Securing Open-Source LLMs Against Malicious Fine-tuning via Safety Guidance TriggerSunguk Shin, Fangzhao Wu, Byung-Jun Lee, Meeyoung Cha et al.ACL 2026
- Taylor Unswift: Secured Weight Release for Large Language Models via Taylor ExpansionGuanchu Wang, Yu-Neng Chuang, Ruixiang Tang, Shaochen Zhong et al.EMNLP 2024
- Watch your steps: Dormant Adversarial Behaviors that Activate upon LLM FinetuningThibaud Gloaguen, Mark Vero, Robin Staab, Martin VechevICLR 2026 · 4 citations
