An Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Portraits
Nicolas Chahine, Ana-Stefania Calarasanu, Davide Garcia-Civiero, Théo Cayla, Sira Ferradans, Jean Ponce
Abstract
Year after year, the demand for ever-better smartphone photos continues to grow, in particular in the domain of portrait photography. Manufacturers thus use perceptual quality criteria throughout the development of smartphone cameras. This costly procedure can be partially replaced by automated learning-based methods for image quality assessment (IQA). Due to its subjective nature, it is necessary to estimate and guarantee the consistency of the IQA process, a characteristic lacking in the mean opinion scores (MOS) widely used for crowdsourcing IQA. In addition, existing blind IQA (BIQA) datasets pay little attention to the difficulty of cross-content assessment, which may degrade the quality of annotations. This paper introduces PIQ23, a portrait-specific IQA dataset of 5116 images of 50 predefined scenarios acquired by 100 smartphones, covering a high variety of brands, models, and use cases. The dataset includes individuals of various genders and ethnicities who have given explicit and informed consent for their photographs to be used in public research. It is annotated by pairwise comparisons (PWC) collected from over 30 image quality experts for three image attributes: face detail preservation, face target exposure, and overall image quality. An in-depth statistical analysis of these annotations allows us to evaluate their consistency over PIQ23. Finally, we show through an extensive comparison with existing baselines that semantic information (image context) can be used to improve IQA predictions. The dataset along with the proposed statistical analysis and BIQA algorithms are available: https://github.com/DXOMARK-Research/PIQ2023
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- FVQ: A Large-Scale Dataset and an LMM-based Method for Face Video Quality AssessmentSijing Wu, Yunhao Li, Ziwen Xu, Yixuan Gao et al.ACM MM 2025 · 8 citations
- MR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment with Multi-Reference Representations from Synthetic Data GenerationFu-Zhao Ou, Chongyi Li, Shiqi Wang, Sam KwongICCV 2025 · 4 citations
- F-Bench: Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation Metrics for Benchmarking Face Generation, Customization, and RestorationLu Liu, Huiyu Duan, Qiang Hu, Liu Yang et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- FPEM: Face Prior Enhanced Facial Attractiveness Prediction for Live Videos with Face RetouchingHui Li, Xiaoyu Ren, Hongjiu Yu, Ying Chen et al.ICCV 2025 · 1 citation
- DSL-FIQA: Assessing Facial Image Quality via Dual-Set Degradation Learning and Landmark-Guided TransformerWei-Ting Chen, Gurunandan Krishnan, Qiang Gao, Sy-Yen Kuo et al.CVPR 2024
Builds on7
- MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality TransformerJunjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,325 citations
- Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper NetworkShaolin Su, Qingsen Yan, Yu Zhu, Cheng Zhang et al.CVPR 2020
- RetinaFace: Single-Shot Multi-Level Face Localisation in the WildJiankang Deng, Jia Guo, Evangelos Ververas, Irene Kotsia et al.CVPR 2020
- Perceptual Quality Assessment of Smartphone PhotographyYuming Fang, Hanwei Zhu, Yan Zeng, Kede Ma et al.CVPR 2020
- From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture QualityZhenqiang Ying, Haoran Niu, Praful Gupta, Dhruv Mahajan et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- SQAD: Automatic Smartphone Camera Quality Assessment and BenchmarkingZilin Fang, Andrey Ignatov, Eduard Zamfir, Radu TimofteICCV 2023 · 6 citations
- Feature Denoising Diffusion Model for Blind Image Quality AssessmentXudong Li, Yan Zhang, Yunhang Shen, Ke Li et al.AAAI 2025
- PUGCQ: A Large Scale Dataset for Quality Assessment of Professional User-Generated ContentGuo Li, Baoliang Chen, Lingyu Zhu, Qingwen He et al.ACM MM 2021 · 6 citations
- Learning Flexible Generalization in Video Quality Assessment by Bringing Device and Viewing Condition DistributionsNickolay Safonov, Dmitriy VatolinICML 2026
- Quality-aware Pretrained Models for Blind Image Quality AssessmentKai Zhao, Kun Yuan, Ming Sun, Mading Li et al.CVPR 2023
