Learning to Solve Orienteering Problem with Time Windows and Variable Profits
Songqun Gao, Zanxi Ruan, Patrick Floor, Marco Roveri, Luigi Palopoli, Daniele Fontanelli
Abstract
The orienteering problem with time windows and variable profits (OPTWVP) is common in many real-world applications and involves continuous time variables. Current approaches fail to develop an efficient solver for this orienteering problem variant with discrete and continuous variables. In this paper, we propose a learning-based two-stage DEcoupled discrete-Continuous optimization with Service-time-guided Trajectory (DeCoST), which aims to effectively decouple the discrete and continuous decision variables in the OPTWVP problem, while enabling efficient and learnable coordination between them. In the first stage, a parallel decoding structure is employed to predict the path and the initial service time allocation. The second stage optimizes the service times through a linear programming (LP) formulation and provides a long-horizon learning of structure estimation. We rigorously prove the global optimality of the second-stage solution. Experiments on OPTWVP instances demonstrate that DeCoST outperforms both state-of-the-art constructive solvers and the latest meta-heuristic algorithms in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency, achieving up to 6.6x inference speedup on instances with fewer than 500 nodes. Moreover, the proposed framework is compatible with various constructive solvers and consistently enhances the solution quality for OPTWVP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 849fcf68-26fd-4418-88bd-e83021389813Builds on30
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement LearningYeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- DIFUSCO: Graph-based Diffusion Solvers for Combinatorial OptimizationZhiqing Sun, Yiming YangNeurIPS 2023 · 356 citations
- Neural Combinatorial Optimization with Heavy Decoder: Toward Large Scale GeneralizationFu Luo, Xi Lin, Fei Liu, Qingfu Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 248 citations
- NeuroLKH: Combining Deep Learning Model with Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun Heuristic for Solving the Traveling Salesman ProblemLiang Xin, Wen Song, Zhiguang Cao, Jie ZhangNeurIPS 2021 · 202 citations
Related papers
- A Learning-Augmented Dynamic Programming Approach for Orienteering Problem with Time WindowsGuansheng Peng, Lining Xing, Fuyan Ma, Aldy Gunawan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- End-to-End Learning for Optimization via Constraint-Enforcing ApproximatorsRares Cristian, Pavithra Harsha, Georgia Perakis, Brian Leo Quanz et al.AAAI 2023 · 17 citations
- Approximation Algorithms for the Team Orienteering ProblemWenzheng Xu, Zichuan Xu, Jian Peng, Weifa Liang et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 38 citations
- The Perils of Learning Before OptimizingChris Cameron, Jason S. Hartford, Taylor Lundy, Kevin Leyton-BrownAAAI 2022 · 28 citations
- Smart Predict-and-Optimize for Hard Combinatorial Optimization ProblemsJayanta Mandi, Emir Demirovic, Peter J. Stuckey, Tias GunsAAAI 2020 · 184 citations
