Unlock the Intermittent Control Ability of Model Free Reinforcement Learning
Jiashun Liu, Jianye Hao, Xiaotian Hao, Yi Ma, Yan Zheng, Yujing Hu, Tangjie Lv
Abstract
Intermittent control problems are common in real world. The interactions between the decision maker and the executor can be discontinuous (intermittent) due to various types of interruptions, e.g. unstable communication channel. Due to intermittent interaction, agents are unable to acquire the state sent by the executor and cannot transmit actions to the executor within a period of time step, i.e. bidirectional blockage, which may lead to inefficiencies of reinforcement learning policies and prevent the executors from completing the task. Such problem is not well studied in the RL community. In this paper, we model Intermittent Control Problem as an Intermittent Control Markov Decision Process, i.e., agents are expected to generate action sequences corresponding to the unavailable states and transmit them before disabling interactions to ensure the smooth and effective motion of executors. However, directly generating multiple future actions in the original action space has unnatural motion issue and exploration difficulty. We propose M ulti-step A ction R epre S entation ( MARS ), which encodes a sequence of actions from the original action space to a compact and decodable latent space. Then based on the latent action sequence representation, the mainstream RL methods can be easily optimized to learn a smooth and efficient motion policy. Extensive experiments on simulation tasks and real-world robotic grasping tasks show that MARS significantly improves the learning efficiency and final performances compared with existing baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 847b9616-bdba-43dc-80f0-bd67fd8fd029Cited by top-tier papers2
- SEBA: Sample-Efficient Black-Box Attacks on Visual Reinforcement LearningTairan Huang, Yulin Jin, Junxu Liu, Qingqing Ye et al.CVPR 2026
- The Courage to Stop: Overcoming Sunk Cost Fallacy in Deep Reinforcement LearningJiashun Liu, Johan S. Obando-Ceron, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.ICML 2025
Builds on8
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive RepresentationsMax Schwarzer, Ankesh Anand, Rishab Goel, R. Devon Hjelm et al.ICLR 2021 · 399 citations
- Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive ControlNicklas Hansen, Hao Su, Xiaolong WangICML 2022 · 388 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Prototypical RepresentationsDenis Yarats, Rob Fergus, Alessandro Lazaric, Lerrel PintoICML 2021 · 262 citations
- HyAR: Addressing Discrete-Continuous Action Reinforcement Learning via Hybrid Action RepresentationBoyan Li, Hongyao Tang, Yan Zheng, Jianye Hao et al.ICLR 2022 · 79 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Block MDPs: A Model-free Representation Learning approachXuezhou Zhang, Yuda Song, Masatoshi Uehara, Mengdi Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 65 citations
- Efficient Planning with Latent DiffusionWenhao LiICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Learning High-Frequency Continuous Action Chunks in Latent SpaceKunyun Wang, Yuhang Zheng, Yupeng Zheng, Jieru Zhao et al.ICML 2026
- Stochastic Latent Actor-Critic: Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Latent Variable ModelAlex X. Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Addressing Signal Delay in Deep Reinforcement LearningWilliam Wei Wang, Dongqi Han, Xufang Luo, Dongsheng LiICLR 2024 · 13 citations
