Faster approximate subgraph counts with privacy
Dung Nguyen, Mahantesh Halappanavar, Venkatesh Srinivasan, Anil Vullikanti
Abstract
One of the most common problems studied in the context of differential privacy for graph data is counting the number of non-induced embeddings of a subgraph in a given graph. These counts have very high global sensitivity. Therefore, adding noise based on powerful alternative techniques, such as smooth sensitivity and higher-order local sensitivity have been shown to give significantly better accuracy. However, all these alternatives to global sensitivity become computationally very expensive, and to date efficient polynomial time algorithms are known only for few selected subgraphs, such as triangles, k -triangles, and k -stars. In this paper, we show that good approximations to these sensitivity metrics can be still used to get private algorithms. Using this approach, we much faster algorithms for privately counting the number of triangles in real-world social networks, which can be easily parallelized. We also give a private polynomial time algorithm for counting any constant size subgraph using less noise than the global sensitivity; we show this can be improved significantly for counting paths in special classes of graphs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 83edf4de-adaf-45c9-9e1e-e85fd8b6320eCited by top-tier papers2
- On the trade-off between expressivity and privacy in graph representation learningPatrick Indri, Tamara Drucks, Thomas GärtnerICLR 2026
- Differentially Private Range Subgraph CountingXian Chen, Ruobing Bai, Pan PengICML 2026
Builds on8
- Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Ting Yu, Yin Yang, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2017 · 266 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 139 citations
- Instance-optimality in differential privacy via approximate inverse sensitivity mechanismsHilal Asi, John C. DuchiNeurIPS 2020 · 72 citations
- Differentially Private Densest Subgraph DetectionDung Nguyen, Anil VullikantiICML 2021 · 26 citations
- Differential Privacy from Locally Adjustable Graph Algorithms: k-Core Decomposition, Low Out-Degree Ordering, and Densest SubgraphsLaxman Dhulipala, Quanquan C. Liu, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Jessica Shi et al.FOCS 2022 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Robust Privacy-Preserving Triangle Counting under Edge Local Differential PrivacyYizhang He, Kai Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 5 citations
- Privacy-Preserving Triangle Counting in Directed GraphsZiyao Wei, Qing Liu, Zhikun Zhang, Shouling Ji et al.ICDE 2025
- Differentially Private Triangle and 4-Cycle Counting in the Shuffle ModelJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriCCS 2022 · 30 citations
- Triangle Counting Over Signed Graphs with Differential PrivacyZening Li, Rong-Hua Li, Fusheng JinICDE 2025 · 1 citation
- Communication-Efficient Triangle Counting under Local Differential PrivacyJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2022
