AIMEE: An Exploratory Study of How Rules Support AI Developers to Explain and Edit Models
David Piorkowski, Inge Vejsbjerg, Owen Cornec, Elizabeth M. Daly, Öznur Alkan
Abstract
In real-world applications when deploying Machine Learning (ML) models, initial model development includes close analysis of the model results and behavior by a data scientist. Once trained, however, models may need to be retrained with new data or updated to adhere to new rules or regulations. This presents two challenges. First, how to communicate how a model is making its decisions before and after retraining, and second how to support model editing to take into account new requirements. To address these needs, we built AIMEE (AI Model Explorer and Editor), a tool created to address these challenges by providing interactive methods to explain, visualize, and modify model decision boundaries using rules. Rules should benefit model builders by providing a layer of abstraction for understanding and manipulating the model and reduces the need to modify individual rows of data directly. To evaluate if this was the case, we conducted a pair of user studies totaling 23 participants to evaluate AIMEE's rules-based approach for model explainability and editing. We found that participants correctly interpreted rules and report on their perspectives of how rules are beneficial (and not), ways that rules could support collaboration, and provide a usability evaluation of the tool.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 833e715f-02da-461b-9028-edd7bde56ebdCited by top-tier papers5
- End User Authoring of Personalized Content Classifiers: Comparing Example Labeling, Rule Writing, and LLM PromptingLeijie Wang, Kathryn Yurechko, Pranati Dani, Quan Ze Chen et al.CHI 2025 · 7 citations
- Divisi: Interactive Search and Visualization for Scalable Exploratory Subgroup AnalysisVenkatesh Sivaraman, Zexuan Li, Adam PererCHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Editable XAI: Toward Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment with Co-Editable Explanations of Interpretable AttributesHaoyang Chen, Jingwen Bai, Fang Tian, Brian Y. LimCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Behavior Matters: An Alternative Perspective on Promoting Responsible Data ScienceZiwei Dong, Ameya B. Patil, Yuichi Shoda, Leilani Battle et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Promptimizer: User-Led Prompt Optimization for Personal Content ClassificationLeijie Wang, Kathryn Yurechko, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Related papers
- VIME: Visual Interactive Model Explorer for Identifying Capabilities and Limitations of Machine Learning Models for Sequential Decision-MakingAnindya Das Antar, Somayeh Molaei, Yan-Ying Chen, Matthew L. Lee et al.UIST 2024 · 3 citations
- User Driven Model Adjustment via Boolean Rule ExplanationsElizabeth M. Daly, Massimiliano Mattetti, Öznur Alkan, Rahul NairAAAI 2021 · 13 citations
- Marcelle: Composing Interactive Machine Learning Workflows and InterfacesJules Françoise, Baptiste Caramiaux, Téo SanchezUIST 2021 · 37 citations
- Interpretability Gone Bad: The Role of Bounded Rationality in How Practitioners Understand Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Matthew R. Conrad, Davis Rule, Cliff Lampe et al.CSCW 2024 · 14 citations
- Analyzing Collaborative Challenges and Needs of UX Practitioners when Designing with AI/MLMeena Devii Muralikumar, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2024 · 6 citations
