Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
Jan Tauberschmidt, Sophie Fellenz, Sebastian Josef Vollmer, Andrew B. Duncan
Abstract
We present a framework for fine-tuning flow-matching generative models to enforce physical constraints and solve inverse problems in scientific systems. Starting from a model trained on low-fidelity or observational data, we apply a differentiable post-training procedure that minimizes weak-form residuals of governing partial differential equations (PDEs), promoting physical consistency and adherence to boundary conditions without distorting the underlying learned distribution. To infer unknown physical inputs, such as source terms, material parameters, or boundary data, we augment the generative process with a learnable latent parameter predictor and propose a joint optimization strategy. The resulting model produces physically valid field solutions alongside plausible estimates of hidden parameters, effectively addressing ill-posed inverse problems in a data-driven yet physics-aware manner. We validate our method on canonical PDE problems, demonstrating improved satisfaction of physical constraints and accurate recovery of latent coefficients. Further, we confirm cross-domain utility through fine-tuning of natural-image models. Our approach bridges generative modelling and scientific inference, opening new avenues for simulation-augmented discovery and data-efficient modelling of physical systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 82e14b9a-4674-423f-83ff-6acf01cb5c10Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
Related papers
- Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard ConstraintsUtkarsh Utkarsh, Pengfei Cai, Alan Edelman, Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 60 citations
- FlowDPS: Flow-Driven Posterior Sampling for Inverse ProblemsJeongsol Kim, Bryan Sangwoo Kim, Jong Chul YeICCV 2025 · 6 citations
- Physics-Informed Diffusion Models in Spectral SpaceDavide Gallon, Philippe von Wurstemberger, Patrick Cheridito, Arnulf JentzenICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Gradient-Free Generation for Hard-Constrained SystemsChaoran Cheng, Boran Han, Danielle C. Maddix, Abdul Fatir Ansari et al.ICLR 2025
- DNF-Intrinsic: Deterministic Noise-Free Diffusion for Indoor Inverse RenderingRongjia Zheng, Qing Zhang, Chengjiang Long, Wei-Shi ZhengICCV 2025 · 2 citations
